Testing Fate

Tay-Sachs Disease and the Right to Be Responsible

Nonfiction, Health & Well Being, Medical, Reference, History, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Discrimination & Race Relations
Cover of the book Testing Fate by Shelley Z. Reuter, University of Minnesota Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Shelley Z. Reuter ISBN: 9781452951898
Publisher: University of Minnesota Press Publication: August 17, 2016
Imprint: Univ Of Minnesota Press Language: English
Author: Shelley Z. Reuter
ISBN: 9781452951898
Publisher: University of Minnesota Press
Publication: August 17, 2016
Imprint: Univ Of Minnesota Press
Language: English

In today’s world, responsible biocitizenship has become a new way of belonging in society. Individuals are expected to make “responsible” medical choices, including the decision to be screened for genetic disease. Paradoxically, we have even come to see ourselves as having the right to be responsible vis-à-vis the proactive mitigation of genetic risk. At the same time, the concept of genetic disease has become a new and powerful way of defining the boundaries between human groups. Tay-Sachs, an autosomal recessive disorder, is a case in point—with origins in the period of Eastern European Jewish immigration to the United States and United Kingdom that spanned the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, it has a long and fraught history as a marker of Jewish racial difference. 

In Testing Fate, Shelley Z. Reuter asks: Can the biocitizen, especially one historically defined as a racialized and pathologized Other, be said to be exercising authentic, free choice in deciding whether to undertake genetic screening? Drawing on a range of historical and contemporary examples—doctors’ medical reports of Tay-Sachs since the first case was documented in 1881, the medical field’s construction of Tay-Sachs as a disease of Jewish immigrants, YouTube videos of children with Tay-Sachs that frame the disease as tragic disability avoidable through a simple genetic test, and medical malpractice suits since the test for the disease became available—Reuter shows that true agency in genetic decision-making can be exercised only from a place of cultural inclusion. Choice in this context is in fact a kind of unfreedom—a moral duty to act that is not really agency at all.  

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In today’s world, responsible biocitizenship has become a new way of belonging in society. Individuals are expected to make “responsible” medical choices, including the decision to be screened for genetic disease. Paradoxically, we have even come to see ourselves as having the right to be responsible vis-à-vis the proactive mitigation of genetic risk. At the same time, the concept of genetic disease has become a new and powerful way of defining the boundaries between human groups. Tay-Sachs, an autosomal recessive disorder, is a case in point—with origins in the period of Eastern European Jewish immigration to the United States and United Kingdom that spanned the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, it has a long and fraught history as a marker of Jewish racial difference. 

In Testing Fate, Shelley Z. Reuter asks: Can the biocitizen, especially one historically defined as a racialized and pathologized Other, be said to be exercising authentic, free choice in deciding whether to undertake genetic screening? Drawing on a range of historical and contemporary examples—doctors’ medical reports of Tay-Sachs since the first case was documented in 1881, the medical field’s construction of Tay-Sachs as a disease of Jewish immigrants, YouTube videos of children with Tay-Sachs that frame the disease as tragic disability avoidable through a simple genetic test, and medical malpractice suits since the test for the disease became available—Reuter shows that true agency in genetic decision-making can be exercised only from a place of cultural inclusion. Choice in this context is in fact a kind of unfreedom—a moral duty to act that is not really agency at all.  

More books from University of Minnesota Press

Cover of the book Last Project Standing by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Picturing the Cosmos by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Manifestly Haraway by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book In Search of a New Image of Thought by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Pregnant on Arrival by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book The Anthrobscene by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Happy Times in Norway by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book On Doubt by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Deep Woods, Wild Waters by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Everybody's Heard about the Bird by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Water and What We Know by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Tony Oliva by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book The Servant Class City by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Police in the Hallways by Shelley Z. Reuter
Cover of the book Global Gangs by Shelley Z. Reuter
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy