The ability of young children to distinguish between morality and convention

Nonfiction, Health & Well Being, Psychology, Developmental Psychology
Cover of the book The ability of young children to distinguish between morality and convention by Joerg Boettcher, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Joerg Boettcher ISBN: 9783640175574
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: September 24, 2008
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Joerg Boettcher
ISBN: 9783640175574
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: September 24, 2008
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Diploma Thesis from the year 2001 in the subject Psychology - Developmental Psychology, grade: 1,0, Free University of Berlin, 95 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In this diploma thesis I want to consider several approaches in the area of moral development research.Given the theory of Lawrence Kohlberg, young children (younger than 10 years of age) seem to stay completely under the constraints of authorities and rules. According to Kohlberg, children's social judgments and behaviors are determined by instrumental aims to satisfy their own needs and wishes, or to avoid punishment. In this regard, the helping of others or meeting the needs of others is only motivated by instrumental considerations. Thus, in Kohlberg's view young children are not able to think or to act in a genuinely moral way. In reaction to Kohlberg, other researchers have suggested that young children are capable to make genuinely moral judgments and to act in a moral way. Eisenberg (e.g. 1986) has suggested that young children can have empathic or altruistic feelings which lead them to conduct prosocial acts. Other researchers (e.g. Keller, 1996; Nunner-Winkler, 1993) assert that children under the age of ten years are able to understand and feel moral emotions, which they consider as constitutive or as indicators for morality. Turiel and his associates (e.g. Turiel, 1983) suggest that even children at about 2 years of age are able to differentiate between a moral, conventional, and personal domain of social knowledge, and that children subordinate the importance of personal and conventional rules under the importance of moral rules. These approaches to the morality of young children revealed differing results to differing aspects of morality. The aim of my work is to examine the above mentioned approaches in order to evaluate the obvious differences between their obtained results and the results of Kohlberg. My questions are: Is Kohlberg's approach of using authority dilemmas appropriate to investigate children's moral reasoning? To what extent do the results of the researchers, who claim an early emergence of morality in children's development, disprove Kohlberg's claims of children's dependency and moral immaturity with regard to authority rules? Where are the boundaries of the presented approaches?

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Diploma Thesis from the year 2001 in the subject Psychology - Developmental Psychology, grade: 1,0, Free University of Berlin, 95 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In this diploma thesis I want to consider several approaches in the area of moral development research.Given the theory of Lawrence Kohlberg, young children (younger than 10 years of age) seem to stay completely under the constraints of authorities and rules. According to Kohlberg, children's social judgments and behaviors are determined by instrumental aims to satisfy their own needs and wishes, or to avoid punishment. In this regard, the helping of others or meeting the needs of others is only motivated by instrumental considerations. Thus, in Kohlberg's view young children are not able to think or to act in a genuinely moral way. In reaction to Kohlberg, other researchers have suggested that young children are capable to make genuinely moral judgments and to act in a moral way. Eisenberg (e.g. 1986) has suggested that young children can have empathic or altruistic feelings which lead them to conduct prosocial acts. Other researchers (e.g. Keller, 1996; Nunner-Winkler, 1993) assert that children under the age of ten years are able to understand and feel moral emotions, which they consider as constitutive or as indicators for morality. Turiel and his associates (e.g. Turiel, 1983) suggest that even children at about 2 years of age are able to differentiate between a moral, conventional, and personal domain of social knowledge, and that children subordinate the importance of personal and conventional rules under the importance of moral rules. These approaches to the morality of young children revealed differing results to differing aspects of morality. The aim of my work is to examine the above mentioned approaches in order to evaluate the obvious differences between their obtained results and the results of Kohlberg. My questions are: Is Kohlberg's approach of using authority dilemmas appropriate to investigate children's moral reasoning? To what extent do the results of the researchers, who claim an early emergence of morality in children's development, disprove Kohlberg's claims of children's dependency and moral immaturity with regard to authority rules? Where are the boundaries of the presented approaches?

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Evaluation of the Fraunhofer Open Source IMS Core platform with special focus on the Call Session Control Function (CSCF) by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book Misunderstanding skills as part of language socialization by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book Auden's Memorial for the City by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book Writing against the odds - the South's cultural and literary struggle against progress and modernity by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book Entwicklung der Filmwirtschaft und Filmproduktion in Deutschland während der NS-Zeit by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book Discussion essay on the short story 'Soldier's Home' by Ernest Hemingway by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book The Rhetorical Approach in the Federalist Papers No.10, No.54, No.84 and No.85 by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book America's National Identity by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book The Enduring Success of the US-American Constitution: Between the Suspicion of a Strong Government and a Strong Social Welfare State by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book Focus strategies in english sentences and their representation in books for school age german learners of english by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book Knowledge is the organisation's essential source of competetive advantage by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book Pat Barker's 'Regeneration' - a piece of historiographic metafiction? by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book Should the High Court or the Parliament determine the rights and freedoms of Australians by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book Trauma - 'Memento' (2001) - eine Analyse by Joerg Boettcher
Cover of the book South African foreign policy and SADC goals - lockstep or deadlock? by Joerg Boettcher
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy