The Company They Keep

How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Constitutional, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, Democracy
Cover of the book The Company They Keep by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum ISBN: 9780190278076
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: January 7, 2019
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
ISBN: 9780190278076
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: January 7, 2019
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

Are Supreme Court justices swayed by the political environment that surrounds them? Most people think "yes," and they point to the influence of the general public and the other branches of government on the Court. It is not that simple, however. As the eminent law and politics scholars Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum show in The Company They Keep, justices today are reacting far more to subtle social forces in their own elite legal world than to pressure from the other branches of government or mass public opinion. In particular, the authors draw from social psychology research to show why Justices are apt to follow the lead of the elite social networks that they are a part of. The evidence is strong: Justices take cues primarily from the people who are closest to them and whose approval they care most about: political, social, and professional elites. In an era of strong partisan polarization, elite social networks are largely bifurcated by partisan and ideological loyalties, and the Justices reflect that division. The result is a Court in which the Justices' ideological stances reflect the dominant views in the appointing president's party. Justices such as Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsburg live largely in a milieu populated by like-minded elites. Today's partisanship on the Court also stems from the emergence of conservative legal networks such as the Federalist Society, that reinforce the conservative leanings of Republican appointees. For the Warren and Burger Courts, elite social networks were dominated by liberal elites and not divided by political party or ideology. A fascinating examination of the factors that shape decision-making, The Company They Keep will reshape our understanding of how political polarization occurs on the contemporary Supreme Court.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Are Supreme Court justices swayed by the political environment that surrounds them? Most people think "yes," and they point to the influence of the general public and the other branches of government on the Court. It is not that simple, however. As the eminent law and politics scholars Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum show in The Company They Keep, justices today are reacting far more to subtle social forces in their own elite legal world than to pressure from the other branches of government or mass public opinion. In particular, the authors draw from social psychology research to show why Justices are apt to follow the lead of the elite social networks that they are a part of. The evidence is strong: Justices take cues primarily from the people who are closest to them and whose approval they care most about: political, social, and professional elites. In an era of strong partisan polarization, elite social networks are largely bifurcated by partisan and ideological loyalties, and the Justices reflect that division. The result is a Court in which the Justices' ideological stances reflect the dominant views in the appointing president's party. Justices such as Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsburg live largely in a milieu populated by like-minded elites. Today's partisanship on the Court also stems from the emergence of conservative legal networks such as the Federalist Society, that reinforce the conservative leanings of Republican appointees. For the Warren and Burger Courts, elite social networks were dominated by liberal elites and not divided by political party or ideology. A fascinating examination of the factors that shape decision-making, The Company They Keep will reshape our understanding of how political polarization occurs on the contemporary Supreme Court.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book To Make Our World Anew by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book The Passport in America by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Must Politics Be War? by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book The Analects of Dasan, Volume III by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book The Future of Imprisonment by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Secession Debated by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Pain Management by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Stalin's Citizens by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Adult Learning Disabilities and ADHD: Research-Informed Assessment by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Qualitative Research and Complex Teams by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Truth by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book The Law and the Lady by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book The Ghost of Jim Crow by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Modeling Ethnomusicology by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Elective Affinities : A Novel by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy