The Congressional Black Caucus, Minority Voting Rights, and the U.S. Supreme Court

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Cultural Studies, African-American Studies, Political Science, Government
Cover of the book The Congressional Black Caucus, Minority Voting Rights, and the U.S. Supreme Court by Christina Rivers, University of Michigan Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Christina Rivers ISBN: 9780472028214
Publisher: University of Michigan Press Publication: July 17, 2012
Imprint: University of Michigan Press Language: English
Author: Christina Rivers
ISBN: 9780472028214
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
Publication: July 17, 2012
Imprint: University of Michigan Press
Language: English

Both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) claim to advocate minority political interests, yet they disagree over the intent and scope of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), as well as the interpretation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Whereas the Court promotes color-blind policies, the CBC advocates race-based remedies. Setting this debate in the context of the history of black political thought, Rivers examines a series of high-profile districting cases, from Rodgers v. Lodge (1982) through NAMUDNO v. Holder (2009). She evaluates the competing approaches to racial equality and concludes, surprisingly, that an originalist, race-conscious interpretation of the 14th Amendment, along with a revised states' rights position regarding electoral districting, may better serve minority political interests.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) claim to advocate minority political interests, yet they disagree over the intent and scope of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), as well as the interpretation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Whereas the Court promotes color-blind policies, the CBC advocates race-based remedies. Setting this debate in the context of the history of black political thought, Rivers examines a series of high-profile districting cases, from Rodgers v. Lodge (1982) through NAMUDNO v. Holder (2009). She evaluates the competing approaches to racial equality and concludes, surprisingly, that an originalist, race-conscious interpretation of the 14th Amendment, along with a revised states' rights position regarding electoral districting, may better serve minority political interests.

More books from University of Michigan Press

Cover of the book Faith in the City by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Gates of Freedom by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Secret Spaces of Childhood by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Ushering in a New Republic by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Playing Underground by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book The Deregulatory Moment? by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book The Afterlife of Pope Joan by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book The Biopolitics of Disability by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Waltzing the Magpies by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Quick by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Strange Cocktail by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Finance Capitalism Unveiled by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Legal Modernism by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book From Inclusion to Influence by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Indecision in American Legislatures by Christina Rivers
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy