The Darwin Economy: Liberty, Competition, and the Common Good

Business & Finance, Economics, Theory of Economics, Economic History
Cover of the book The Darwin Economy: Liberty, Competition, and the Common Good by Robert H. Frank, Princeton University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Robert H. Frank ISBN: 9781400839377
Publisher: Princeton University Press Publication: August 15, 2011
Imprint: Princeton University Press Language: English
Author: Robert H. Frank
ISBN: 9781400839377
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Publication: August 15, 2011
Imprint: Princeton University Press
Language: English

Who was the greater economist--Adam Smith or Charles Darwin? The question seems absurd. Darwin, after all, was a naturalist, not an economist. But Robert Frank, New York Times economics columnist and best-selling author of The Economic Naturalist, predicts that within the next century Darwin will unseat Smith as the intellectual founder of economics. The reason, Frank argues, is that Darwin's understanding of competition describes economic reality far more accurately than Smith's. And the consequences of this fact are profound. Indeed, the failure to recognize that we live in Darwin's world rather than Smith's is putting us all at risk by preventing us from seeing that competition alone will not solve our problems.

Smith's theory of the invisible hand, which says that competition channels self-interest for the common good, is probably the most widely cited argument today in favor of unbridled competition--and against regulation, taxation, and even government itself. But what if Smith's idea was almost an exception to the general rule of competition? That's what Frank argues, resting his case on Darwin's insight that individual and group interests often diverge sharply. Far from creating a perfect world, economic competition often leads to "arms races," encouraging behaviors that not only cause enormous harm to the group but also provide no lasting advantages for individuals, since any gains tend to be relative and mutually offsetting.

The good news is that we have the ability to tame the Darwin economy. The best solution is not to prohibit harmful behaviors but to tax them. By doing so, we could make the economic pie larger, eliminate government debt, and provide better public services, all without requiring painful sacrifices from anyone. That's a bold claim, Frank concedes, but it follows directly from logic and evidence that most people already accept.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Who was the greater economist--Adam Smith or Charles Darwin? The question seems absurd. Darwin, after all, was a naturalist, not an economist. But Robert Frank, New York Times economics columnist and best-selling author of The Economic Naturalist, predicts that within the next century Darwin will unseat Smith as the intellectual founder of economics. The reason, Frank argues, is that Darwin's understanding of competition describes economic reality far more accurately than Smith's. And the consequences of this fact are profound. Indeed, the failure to recognize that we live in Darwin's world rather than Smith's is putting us all at risk by preventing us from seeing that competition alone will not solve our problems.

Smith's theory of the invisible hand, which says that competition channels self-interest for the common good, is probably the most widely cited argument today in favor of unbridled competition--and against regulation, taxation, and even government itself. But what if Smith's idea was almost an exception to the general rule of competition? That's what Frank argues, resting his case on Darwin's insight that individual and group interests often diverge sharply. Far from creating a perfect world, economic competition often leads to "arms races," encouraging behaviors that not only cause enormous harm to the group but also provide no lasting advantages for individuals, since any gains tend to be relative and mutually offsetting.

The good news is that we have the ability to tame the Darwin economy. The best solution is not to prohibit harmful behaviors but to tax them. By doing so, we could make the economic pie larger, eliminate government debt, and provide better public services, all without requiring painful sacrifices from anyone. That's a bold claim, Frank concedes, but it follows directly from logic and evidence that most people already accept.

More books from Princeton University Press

Cover of the book The King's Two Bodies by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book Facing the Challenge of Democracy by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book Family Values by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book The Soul of the World by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book Pogrom in Gujarat by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book The Furies by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book Before and After Muhammad by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book Homology, Genes, and Evolutionary Innovation by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book Exchange-Rate Dynamics by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book Worldly Philosopher by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book Competition Policy and Price Fixing by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book The Elements of Library Research by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book The Discrete Charm of the Machine by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book State of the Union by Robert H. Frank
Cover of the book Machiavelli's God by Robert H. Frank
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy