The European Union and the World Trade Organisation - Two governance systems in trade policy: A selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences

Two governance systems in trade policy: A selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book The European Union and the World Trade Organisation - Two governance systems in trade policy: A selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences by Joanna Mastalerek, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Joanna Mastalerek ISBN: 9783638268752
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: April 16, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Joanna Mastalerek
ISBN: 9783638268752
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: April 16, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1,0 (A), Hamburg University of Ecomomy and Policy (Political Science), course: Globalisation and European Governance, language: English, abstract: In general terms, both the European Union (EU) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) can be described as governance systems: 'Governance is about the structured ways and means in which the divergent preferences of interdependent actors are translated into policy choices to allocate values, so that the plurality of interests is transformed into co-ordinated action and the compliance of actors is achieved.'1 This essay cannot reflect all aspects of the two governance systems, but is limited to a selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences. After the opening remark alludes to a similarity, the differences will be touched upon next. The individual characteristics of the EU and the WTO become particularly obvious in the institutional set-ups of the two organisations: In the case of the EU one deals with a supranational organisation, what means that the current 15 member states partly transfer sovereign rights to the organisation, thus rendering the EU a partly independent and powerful policy actor. In comparison, the WTO is an intergovernmental organisation, in which its 146 members negotiate without transferring any sovereignity to the organisation, thus depriving the WTO of any independence in policy decisions 2. The WTO is a broad international organisation, its members accounting for over 90 % of all trade in the world, whereas the EU, being a member of the WTO, is a geographically limited and closely integrated organisation. Even though the EU represents just 6 % of the world's population, it accounts for more than a fifth of global imports and exports3. Concerning the relationship between the two organisations, their origins had an important influence: The WTO was founded in 1995 as a successor of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) from 1947. [...] 1 Beate Kohler-Koch/ Rainer Eising (eds.): The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London, New York: Routledge, 1999, p. 5. 2 Mary Farrell (ed.): EU and WTO regulatory frameworks. Complementarity or competition? London: Kogan Page, 1999, p. 44. 3 European Union: Making globalisation work for everyone.The European Union and world trade. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003, p. 4.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1,0 (A), Hamburg University of Ecomomy and Policy (Political Science), course: Globalisation and European Governance, language: English, abstract: In general terms, both the European Union (EU) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) can be described as governance systems: 'Governance is about the structured ways and means in which the divergent preferences of interdependent actors are translated into policy choices to allocate values, so that the plurality of interests is transformed into co-ordinated action and the compliance of actors is achieved.'1 This essay cannot reflect all aspects of the two governance systems, but is limited to a selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences. After the opening remark alludes to a similarity, the differences will be touched upon next. The individual characteristics of the EU and the WTO become particularly obvious in the institutional set-ups of the two organisations: In the case of the EU one deals with a supranational organisation, what means that the current 15 member states partly transfer sovereign rights to the organisation, thus rendering the EU a partly independent and powerful policy actor. In comparison, the WTO is an intergovernmental organisation, in which its 146 members negotiate without transferring any sovereignity to the organisation, thus depriving the WTO of any independence in policy decisions 2. The WTO is a broad international organisation, its members accounting for over 90 % of all trade in the world, whereas the EU, being a member of the WTO, is a geographically limited and closely integrated organisation. Even though the EU represents just 6 % of the world's population, it accounts for more than a fifth of global imports and exports3. Concerning the relationship between the two organisations, their origins had an important influence: The WTO was founded in 1995 as a successor of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) from 1947. [...] 1 Beate Kohler-Koch/ Rainer Eising (eds.): The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London, New York: Routledge, 1999, p. 5. 2 Mary Farrell (ed.): EU and WTO regulatory frameworks. Complementarity or competition? London: Kogan Page, 1999, p. 44. 3 European Union: Making globalisation work for everyone.The European Union and world trade. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003, p. 4.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book A Streetcar Named Desire: the symbolic meaning of names, setting and colors by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Literature Review: The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World, Niall Ferguson by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book L'aquaculture marine et sa relation avec l'environnement et l'économie by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book The Enduring Success of the US-American Constitution: Between the Suspicion of a Strong Government and a Strong Social Welfare State by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book UAE and Globalization - Attracting Foreign Investments by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Quantifying Variation of the Expanded Form in English by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book The Horror Film - Analysis of 'Nosferatu' from 1922 and 1979 by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Das Verhältnis der Kunst zum absoluten Geist in Hegels Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften (§§562-563) by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Potential of Geo-Marketing-Tools for the development of advanced Online-Marketing business models by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Analysing the marketing in christmas time by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book The Implications of the Concept of Equity in the New Law of the Sea by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book A view on American Indians in the United States from World War II to the present by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Comparativa de la antigua y actual experiencia migratoria española a Alemania by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Strengths and weaknesses of the oversight over the auditing profession in the UK and USA. A description, analysis and discussion by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book The Metamorphosis of Alex in Stanley Kubrick's 'Clockwork Orange' from a Viewpoint of Abnormal Psychology by Joanna Mastalerek
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy