The Gravitational Probe B Boondoggle

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Science, Physics, Gravity
Cover of the book The Gravitational Probe B Boondoggle by James Constant, James Constant
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: James Constant ISBN: 9781311607263
Publisher: James Constant Publication: January 27, 2015
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: James Constant
ISBN: 9781311607263
Publisher: James Constant
Publication: January 27, 2015
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

Einstein's theory, in its so called weak gravity field linearized version, approximately reduces to Newton's theory. Conflicting linearizations depend on their authors and, are heavily mathematical, involve non-physical geometrical concepts, and rely on Newtonian type tests and results. For example, Einstein's theory does not inform us how, absent force, his warped geometry might actuate Newton's gyroscope. Basically, Einstein tells us that one can ignore Newton's predictions based on Newton's force F but, nevertheless, use Newton's force F and gyroscope to prove his predictions based on weak fields approximating Newton's theory with different equations proposed by different authors. Einstein's theory, and predictions, cannot be confirmed with tests using Newton's force F, and gyroscope. And, they cannot be confirmed when equations are manipulated by their authors. Which set of Einstein's theory predictions is correct? Incredibly, the science community accepts Einstein's theory which relies on Delphic metaphysical equations linearized to approximate Newton's theory and a handful of tests based essentially on Newton's theory. There are many detractors.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Einstein's theory, in its so called weak gravity field linearized version, approximately reduces to Newton's theory. Conflicting linearizations depend on their authors and, are heavily mathematical, involve non-physical geometrical concepts, and rely on Newtonian type tests and results. For example, Einstein's theory does not inform us how, absent force, his warped geometry might actuate Newton's gyroscope. Basically, Einstein tells us that one can ignore Newton's predictions based on Newton's force F but, nevertheless, use Newton's force F and gyroscope to prove his predictions based on weak fields approximating Newton's theory with different equations proposed by different authors. Einstein's theory, and predictions, cannot be confirmed with tests using Newton's force F, and gyroscope. And, they cannot be confirmed when equations are manipulated by their authors. Which set of Einstein's theory predictions is correct? Incredibly, the science community accepts Einstein's theory which relies on Delphic metaphysical equations linearized to approximate Newton's theory and a handful of tests based essentially on Newton's theory. There are many detractors.

More books from James Constant

Cover of the book Stop Judicial Abuse by James Constant
Cover of the book Einstein's Equivalence Postulate and Spacelike Waves by James Constant
Cover of the book Constant v American Micro-Devices (Supreme Court Patent Morass) by James Constant
Cover of the book The Navier-Stokes Millenium Problem by James Constant
Cover of the book The Illusion of Space Expansion by James Constant
Cover of the book U. S. Supreme Court Decision Bush v. Gore by James Constant
Cover of the book Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 96-1178 by James Constant
Cover of the book Cert Denied -The Denial of Certiorari Appeals Without Reasons by James Constant
Cover of the book Government and Law by James Constant
Cover of the book Argument and Program for Certainty in Law by James Constant
Cover of the book Astronomical Rotations by James Constant
Cover of the book Binary Astronomical Orbits And The LIGO Boondoggle by James Constant
Cover of the book Uncertainty of Law and Constitutional Government by James Constant
Cover of the book The Judicial Trinity as Law of The Land by James Constant
Cover of the book Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963 by James Constant
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy