The Limitations of the Open Mind

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Epistemology, Political
Cover of the book The Limitations of the Open Mind by Jeremy Fantl, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Jeremy Fantl ISBN: 9780192535337
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: May 11, 2018
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Jeremy Fantl
ISBN: 9780192535337
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: May 11, 2018
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

When should you engage with difficult arguments against your cherished controversial beliefs? The primary conclusion of this book is that your obligations to engage with counterarguments are more limited than is often thought. In some standard situations, you shouldn't engage with difficult counterarguments and, if you do, you shouldn't engage with them open-mindedly. This conclusion runs counter to aspects of the Millian political tradition and political liberalism, as well as what people working in informal logic tend to say about argumentation. Not all misleading arguments wear their flaws on their sleeve. Each step of a misleading argument might seem compelling and you might not be able to figure out what's wrong with it. Still, even if you can't figure out what's wrong with an argument, you can know that it's misleading. One way to know that an argument is misleading is, counterintuitively, to lack expertise in the methods and evidence-types employed by the argument. When you know that a counterargument is misleading, you shouldn't engage with it open-mindedly and sometimes shouldn't engage with it at all. You shouldn't engage open-mindedly because you shouldn't be willing to reduce your confidence in response to arguments you know are misleading. And you sometimes shouldn't engage closed-mindedly, because to do so can be manipulative or ineffective. In making this case, Jeremy Fantl discusses echo chambers and group polarization, the importance in academic writing of a sympathetic case for the opposition, the epistemology of disagreement, the account of open-mindedness, and invitations to problematic academic speakers.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

When should you engage with difficult arguments against your cherished controversial beliefs? The primary conclusion of this book is that your obligations to engage with counterarguments are more limited than is often thought. In some standard situations, you shouldn't engage with difficult counterarguments and, if you do, you shouldn't engage with them open-mindedly. This conclusion runs counter to aspects of the Millian political tradition and political liberalism, as well as what people working in informal logic tend to say about argumentation. Not all misleading arguments wear their flaws on their sleeve. Each step of a misleading argument might seem compelling and you might not be able to figure out what's wrong with it. Still, even if you can't figure out what's wrong with an argument, you can know that it's misleading. One way to know that an argument is misleading is, counterintuitively, to lack expertise in the methods and evidence-types employed by the argument. When you know that a counterargument is misleading, you shouldn't engage with it open-mindedly and sometimes shouldn't engage with it at all. You shouldn't engage open-mindedly because you shouldn't be willing to reduce your confidence in response to arguments you know are misleading. And you sometimes shouldn't engage closed-mindedly, because to do so can be manipulative or ineffective. In making this case, Jeremy Fantl discusses echo chambers and group polarization, the importance in academic writing of a sympathetic case for the opposition, the epistemology of disagreement, the account of open-mindedness, and invitations to problematic academic speakers.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Challenging Concepts in Obstetrics and Gynaecology by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book Death before Birth by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book Collected Ghost Stories by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book Oxford Handbook of Clinical Examination and Practical Skills by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book The Theoretical Practices of Physics by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book Revolutions that Made the Earth by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book Respecting Toleration by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book A General Theory of Domination and Justice by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book How to Study as a Mathematics Major by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in International Law by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book Communism: A Very Short Introduction by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book Divine Agency and Divine Action, Volume I by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Ceramic Analysis by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book Knowledge and Truth in Plato by Jeremy Fantl
Cover of the book Brute Facts by Jeremy Fantl
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy