The Logic of Legal Requirements

Essays on Defeasibility

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Jurisprudence, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book The Logic of Legal Requirements by , OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9780191637681
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: September 13, 2012
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9780191637681
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: September 13, 2012
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

When a legal rule requires us to drive on the right, notarize our wills, or refrain from selling bootleg liquor, how are we to describe and understand that requirement? In particular, how does the logical form of such a requirement relate to the logical form of other requirements, such as moral requirements, or the requirements of logic itself? When a general legal rule is applied or distinguished in a particular case, how can we describe that process in logical form? Such questions have come to preoccupy modern legal philosophy as its methodology, drawing on the philosophy of logic, becomes ever more sophisticated. This collection gathers together some of the most prominent legal philosophers in the Anglo-American and civil law traditions to analyse the logical structure of legal norms. They focus on the issue of defeasibility, which has become a central concern for both logicians and legal philosophers in recent years. The book is divided into four parts. The first section is devoted to unravelling the basic concepts related to legal defeasibility and the logical structure of legal norms, focusing on the idea that law, or its components, are liable to implicit exceptions, which cannot be specified before the law's application to particular cases. Part two aims to disentangle the main relations between the issue of legal defeasibility and the issue of legal interpretation, exploring the topic of defeasibility as a product of certain argumentative techniques in the law. Section 3 of the volume is dedicated to one of the most problematic issues in the history of jurisprudence: the connections between law and morality. Finally, section 4 of the volume is devoted to analysing the relationships between defeasibility and legal adjudication.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

When a legal rule requires us to drive on the right, notarize our wills, or refrain from selling bootleg liquor, how are we to describe and understand that requirement? In particular, how does the logical form of such a requirement relate to the logical form of other requirements, such as moral requirements, or the requirements of logic itself? When a general legal rule is applied or distinguished in a particular case, how can we describe that process in logical form? Such questions have come to preoccupy modern legal philosophy as its methodology, drawing on the philosophy of logic, becomes ever more sophisticated. This collection gathers together some of the most prominent legal philosophers in the Anglo-American and civil law traditions to analyse the logical structure of legal norms. They focus on the issue of defeasibility, which has become a central concern for both logicians and legal philosophers in recent years. The book is divided into four parts. The first section is devoted to unravelling the basic concepts related to legal defeasibility and the logical structure of legal norms, focusing on the idea that law, or its components, are liable to implicit exceptions, which cannot be specified before the law's application to particular cases. Part two aims to disentangle the main relations between the issue of legal defeasibility and the issue of legal interpretation, exploring the topic of defeasibility as a product of certain argumentative techniques in the law. Section 3 of the volume is dedicated to one of the most problematic issues in the history of jurisprudence: the connections between law and morality. Finally, section 4 of the volume is devoted to analysing the relationships between defeasibility and legal adjudication.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Blackstone's Police Operational Handbook 2015 by
Cover of the book Anatomy of the Monocotyledons Volume X: Orchidaceae by
Cover of the book Emotion and Value by
Cover of the book Holocene Extinctions by
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Management Theorists by
Cover of the book Novel Style by
Cover of the book Making the Modern Criminal Law by
Cover of the book Multicultural Odysseys : Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity by
Cover of the book Toxic Aid by
Cover of the book Organizational Traps : Leadership Culture Organizational Design by
Cover of the book Police Law by
Cover of the book Shelleyan Reimaginings and Influence by
Cover of the book EU Social and Employment Law 2E by
Cover of the book Moral Error Theory by
Cover of the book The Pickwick Papers by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy