The Most Democratic Branch

How the Courts Serve America

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Legal History, Constitutional, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government
Cover of the book The Most Democratic Branch by Jeffrey Rosen, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Jeffrey Rosen ISBN: 9780190291754
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: June 19, 2006
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Jeffrey Rosen
ISBN: 9780190291754
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: June 19, 2006
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

Many critics attack federal judges as anti-democratic elitists, activists out of step with the mainstream of American thought. But others argue that judges should stand alone as the ultimate guardians of American values, placing principle before the views of the people. In The Most Democratic Branch, Jeffrey Rosen disagrees with both assertions. Contrary to what interest groups may claim, he contends that, from the days of John Marshall right up to the present, the federal courts by and large have reflected the opinions of the mainstream. More important, he argues that the Supreme Court is most successful when it defers to the constitutional views of the American people, as represented most notably by Congress and the Presidency. And on the rare occasion when they departed from the consensus, the result has often been a disaster. To illustrate, Rosen provides a penetrating look at some of the most important Supreme Court cases in American history--cases involving racial equality, affirmative action, abortion, gay rights and gay marriage, the right to die, electoral disputes, and civil liberties in wartime. Rosen shows that the most notorious constitutional decisions in American history--the ones that have been most strenuously criticized, such as Dred Scott or Roe v. Wade--have gone against mainstream opinion. By contrast, the most successful decisions--from Marbury v. Madison to Brown v. Board of Education--have avoided imposing constitutional principles over the wishes of the people. Rosen concludes that the judiciary works best when it identifies the constitutional principles accepted by a majority of Americans, and enforces them unequivocally as fundamental law. Jeffrey Rosen is one of the most respected legal experts writing today, a regular contributor to The New York Times Magazine and the Legal Affairs Editor of The New Republic. The provocative arguments that he puts forth here are bound to fuel heated debate at a time when the federal judiciary is already the focus of fierce criticism.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Many critics attack federal judges as anti-democratic elitists, activists out of step with the mainstream of American thought. But others argue that judges should stand alone as the ultimate guardians of American values, placing principle before the views of the people. In The Most Democratic Branch, Jeffrey Rosen disagrees with both assertions. Contrary to what interest groups may claim, he contends that, from the days of John Marshall right up to the present, the federal courts by and large have reflected the opinions of the mainstream. More important, he argues that the Supreme Court is most successful when it defers to the constitutional views of the American people, as represented most notably by Congress and the Presidency. And on the rare occasion when they departed from the consensus, the result has often been a disaster. To illustrate, Rosen provides a penetrating look at some of the most important Supreme Court cases in American history--cases involving racial equality, affirmative action, abortion, gay rights and gay marriage, the right to die, electoral disputes, and civil liberties in wartime. Rosen shows that the most notorious constitutional decisions in American history--the ones that have been most strenuously criticized, such as Dred Scott or Roe v. Wade--have gone against mainstream opinion. By contrast, the most successful decisions--from Marbury v. Madison to Brown v. Board of Education--have avoided imposing constitutional principles over the wishes of the people. Rosen concludes that the judiciary works best when it identifies the constitutional principles accepted by a majority of Americans, and enforces them unequivocally as fundamental law. Jeffrey Rosen is one of the most respected legal experts writing today, a regular contributor to The New York Times Magazine and the Legal Affairs Editor of The New Republic. The provocative arguments that he puts forth here are bound to fuel heated debate at a time when the federal judiciary is already the focus of fierce criticism.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book This Life Of Sounds : Evenings For New Music In Buffalo by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Family and Childhood: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Imagining the Balkans by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Developing the Virtues by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Angels in the Machinery by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Religion in Secular Archives by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Singing the Rite to Belong by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Advocacy Practice for Social Justice by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Words and the Mind by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Heart of Buddha, Heart of China by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book The Bijak of Kabir by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Managing Pension and Retirement Plans by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Tense Bees and Shell-Shocked Crabs by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Behind from the Start by Jeffrey Rosen
Cover of the book Theory of the Image by Jeffrey Rosen
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy