The Road to Mass Democracy

Original Intent and the Seventeenth Amendment

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, Democracy
Cover of the book The Road to Mass Democracy by C. H. Hoebeke, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: C. H. Hoebeke ISBN: 9781351474870
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: July 5, 2017
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: C. H. Hoebeke
ISBN: 9781351474870
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: July 5, 2017
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

Until 1913 and passage of the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, US senators were elected by state legislatures, not directly by the people. Progressive Era reformers urged this revision in answer to the corruption of state "machines" under the dominance of party bosses. They also believed that direct elections would make the Senate more responsive to popular concerns regarding the concentrations of business, capital, and labor that in the industrial era gave rise to a growing sense of individual voicelessness. Popular control over the higher affairs of government was thought to be possible, since the spread of information and communications technology was seen as rendering indirect representation through state legislators unnecessary. However sincerely such reasons were advanced, C. H. Hoebeke contends, none of them accorded with the original intent of the Constitution's framers.The driving force behind the Seventeenth Amendment was the furtherance of democracy exactly what the founders were trying to prevent in placing the Senate out of direct popular reach. Democracy was not synonymous with liberty as it is today, but simply meant the absolute rule of the majority. In full reaction to the egalitarian theories of the Enlightenment, and to the excesses of popular government under the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution's framers sought a "mixed" Constitution, an ancient ideal under which democracy was only one element in a balanced republic. Accordingly, only the House of Representatives answered immediately to the people. But as Hoebeke demonstrates, the states never resisted egalitarian encroachments, and had settled for popular expedients when electing both presidents and senators long before the formal cry for amendment. The Progressives' charge that a corrupt and unresponsive Senate could never be reformed until placed directly in the hands of the people was refuted by the amendment itself. As required by the Constitutio

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Until 1913 and passage of the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, US senators were elected by state legislatures, not directly by the people. Progressive Era reformers urged this revision in answer to the corruption of state "machines" under the dominance of party bosses. They also believed that direct elections would make the Senate more responsive to popular concerns regarding the concentrations of business, capital, and labor that in the industrial era gave rise to a growing sense of individual voicelessness. Popular control over the higher affairs of government was thought to be possible, since the spread of information and communications technology was seen as rendering indirect representation through state legislators unnecessary. However sincerely such reasons were advanced, C. H. Hoebeke contends, none of them accorded with the original intent of the Constitution's framers.The driving force behind the Seventeenth Amendment was the furtherance of democracy exactly what the founders were trying to prevent in placing the Senate out of direct popular reach. Democracy was not synonymous with liberty as it is today, but simply meant the absolute rule of the majority. In full reaction to the egalitarian theories of the Enlightenment, and to the excesses of popular government under the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution's framers sought a "mixed" Constitution, an ancient ideal under which democracy was only one element in a balanced republic. Accordingly, only the House of Representatives answered immediately to the people. But as Hoebeke demonstrates, the states never resisted egalitarian encroachments, and had settled for popular expedients when electing both presidents and senators long before the formal cry for amendment. The Progressives' charge that a corrupt and unresponsive Senate could never be reformed until placed directly in the hands of the people was refuted by the amendment itself. As required by the Constitutio

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book A Profile of the American Electorate by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book Islamic Peoples Of The Soviet Un by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book Questioning the ‘Muslim Woman’ by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book What's So Funny? by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book Psychology After the Unconscious by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book The Korean War by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book The Russian General Staff and Asia, 1860-1917 by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book The Women's Movement in Postcolonial Indonesia by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book The Economic Importance of Intangible Assets by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book Individual Differences in Judgement and Decision-Making by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book On Video by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book German Cinema - Terror and Trauma by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book Speedlights & Speedlites by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book Celluloid Mushroom Clouds by C. H. Hoebeke
Cover of the book Conference Interpreting Explained by C. H. Hoebeke
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy