The South Vs. The South

How Anti-Confederate Southerners Shaped the Course of the Civil War

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Cultural Studies, Minority Studies, African-American Studies, History, Americas, United States, Civil War Period (1850-1877)
Cover of the book The South Vs. The South by William W. Freehling, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: William W. Freehling ISBN: 9780199832071
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: November 14, 2002
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: William W. Freehling
ISBN: 9780199832071
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: November 14, 2002
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

Why did the Confederacy lose the Civil War? Most historians point to the larger number of Union troops, for example, or the North's greater industrial might. Now, in The South Vs. the South, one of America's leading authorities on the Civil War era offers an entirely new answer to this question. William Freehling argues that anti-Confederate Southerners--specifically, border state whites and southern blacks--helped cost the Confederacy the war. White men in such border states as Missouri, Kentucky, and Maryland, Freehling points out, were divided in their loyalties--but far more joined the Union army (or simply stayed home) than marched off in Confederate gray. If they had enlisted as rebel troops in the same proportion as white men did farther south, their numbers would have offset all the Confederate casualties during four years of war. In addition, when those states stayed loyal, the vast majority of the South's urban population and industrial capacity remained in Union hands. And many forget, Freehling writes, that the slaves' own decisions led to a series of white decisions (culminating in the Emancipation Proclamation) that turned federal forces into an army of liberation, depriving the South of labor and adding essential troops to the blue ranks. Whether revising our conception of slavery or of Abraham Lincoln, or establishing the antecedents of Martin Luther King, or analyzing Union military strategy, or uncovering new meanings in what is arguably America's greatest piece of sculpture, Augustus St.-Gaudens' Shaw Memorial, Freehling writes with piercing insight and rhetorical verve. Concise and provocative, The South Vs. the South will forever change the way we view the Civil War.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Why did the Confederacy lose the Civil War? Most historians point to the larger number of Union troops, for example, or the North's greater industrial might. Now, in The South Vs. the South, one of America's leading authorities on the Civil War era offers an entirely new answer to this question. William Freehling argues that anti-Confederate Southerners--specifically, border state whites and southern blacks--helped cost the Confederacy the war. White men in such border states as Missouri, Kentucky, and Maryland, Freehling points out, were divided in their loyalties--but far more joined the Union army (or simply stayed home) than marched off in Confederate gray. If they had enlisted as rebel troops in the same proportion as white men did farther south, their numbers would have offset all the Confederate casualties during four years of war. In addition, when those states stayed loyal, the vast majority of the South's urban population and industrial capacity remained in Union hands. And many forget, Freehling writes, that the slaves' own decisions led to a series of white decisions (culminating in the Emancipation Proclamation) that turned federal forces into an army of liberation, depriving the South of labor and adding essential troops to the blue ranks. Whether revising our conception of slavery or of Abraham Lincoln, or establishing the antecedents of Martin Luther King, or analyzing Union military strategy, or uncovering new meanings in what is arguably America's greatest piece of sculpture, Augustus St.-Gaudens' Shaw Memorial, Freehling writes with piercing insight and rhetorical verve. Concise and provocative, The South Vs. the South will forever change the way we view the Civil War.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Orienting of Attention by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book Theorizing the Local by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book Monica by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book Israel's Clandestine Diplomacies by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book Buddhist Extremists and Muslim Minorities by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book The Philosophy of the Young Kant by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book Down to the Wire by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book The Mathematics of Sex by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book Fezzes in the River by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book Feminist Edges of the Qur'an by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book Tales from Longpuddle Level 2 Oxford Bookworms Library by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book The Hidden History of Women's Ordination by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot : A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book Russia by William W. Freehling
Cover of the book Collected Papers, Volume 1 by William W. Freehling
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy