The Unseen Politics of Public Housing

Resident Councils, Communities, and Change

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Social Work, Sociology, Urban
Cover of the book The Unseen Politics of Public Housing by Tiffany Gayle Chenault, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Tiffany Gayle Chenault ISBN: 9780739165089
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: August 15, 2015
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Tiffany Gayle Chenault
ISBN: 9780739165089
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: August 15, 2015
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) emphasizes the word “community” for building economic development, citizen participations, and revitalization of facilities and services in urban and rural areas. Resident Councils are one way to develop and build community among residents of public housing. Despite HUD stressing community building in public housing and investing money and policies around it, there are some resident councils that are not fulfilling the expectations of HUD.
This book is my attempt to describe and explain HUD’s expectations for the resident council as an active agent for community building and the actual practices of the resident council. I argue that policies and regulations of resident councils which exist to support the effectiveness of the resident council in creating and implementing community-building, self-sufficiency, and empowerment activities and goals in a public housing community may do more harm than good.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development invests and spends billions on Public Housing Programs (6.6 billion in 2013). The majority of the 1.2 million people who live in public housing do not live in large urban areas with thousands of people confined to a certain space. The majority of public housing units (90%) have fewer than 500 units. These smaller units and the people that live in them tend to go unnoticed.
This ethnographic case study focuses on explaining and understanding the factors and constraints that exist between HUD's expectations for the resident council as an active agent for community building and the actual practices of the resident council. To explain the disjunction—in fact, to determine if such disjunctions identified by Rivertown council members are real. Using the tenets of Critical Race Theory allows us to understand what forces—either real or imagined, structural or cultural—prevent the resident council from being an effective agent for change in the public housing community.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) emphasizes the word “community” for building economic development, citizen participations, and revitalization of facilities and services in urban and rural areas. Resident Councils are one way to develop and build community among residents of public housing. Despite HUD stressing community building in public housing and investing money and policies around it, there are some resident councils that are not fulfilling the expectations of HUD.
This book is my attempt to describe and explain HUD’s expectations for the resident council as an active agent for community building and the actual practices of the resident council. I argue that policies and regulations of resident councils which exist to support the effectiveness of the resident council in creating and implementing community-building, self-sufficiency, and empowerment activities and goals in a public housing community may do more harm than good.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development invests and spends billions on Public Housing Programs (6.6 billion in 2013). The majority of the 1.2 million people who live in public housing do not live in large urban areas with thousands of people confined to a certain space. The majority of public housing units (90%) have fewer than 500 units. These smaller units and the people that live in them tend to go unnoticed.
This ethnographic case study focuses on explaining and understanding the factors and constraints that exist between HUD's expectations for the resident council as an active agent for community building and the actual practices of the resident council. To explain the disjunction—in fact, to determine if such disjunctions identified by Rivertown council members are real. Using the tenets of Critical Race Theory allows us to understand what forces—either real or imagined, structural or cultural—prevent the resident council from being an effective agent for change in the public housing community.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Race, Gender, and Curriculum Theorizing by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book Between Democracy and Technocracy by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book Tweencom Girls by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book Walk Away by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book Prolegomena to a Carnal Hermeneutics by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book The Obama Doctrine in the Americas by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book Reading Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book The Legitimacy of Miracle by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book Negotiating Group Identities in Multicultural Germany by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book Sexual Myths of Modernity by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book The Dynamics of Connection by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book Readings of Plato's Apology of Socrates by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book America and the Limits of the Politics of Selfishness by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book The 2016 Presidential Election by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
Cover of the book The Evolution of the Fourth Amendment by Tiffany Gayle Chenault
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy