The Use of Air Power in The Second Chechen War. Operational Analysis

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Security
Cover of the book The Use of Air Power in The Second Chechen War. Operational Analysis by william kealey, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: william kealey ISBN: 9783656588238
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: February 5, 2014
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: william kealey
ISBN: 9783656588238
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: February 5, 2014
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Document from the year 2013 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: 89.00, University of Nottingham, language: English, abstract: Since this document primarily focuses on the role of air power within the confines of the latter of the two conflicts, the analysis will be strictly related to just that as opposed to broader military operational analysis, only with occasional reference to the former conflict of 1994-1996. The role of Russian air power throughout the first conflict varies significantly when contrasted with that of the second. This, as will be discussed later, is primarily a result of the lessons learnt from the first conflict- which is generally conceded as a Russian operational failure since Chechnya still remained a de facto independent state following the declaration of the 'Khasavyurt Accords' resulting in a ceasefire in 1996. The second conflict on the other hand, can be considered, at least in operational terms, successful since Russia restored federal control of the territory. Defence cuts and structural problems within the Russian air force attributed to a defeat in the first conflict and a 'humiliating victory' (Haas, D.M: 2004; 1-18) in the second. Although the air force was not the only branch of the Russian military that faced defence cuts, it was perhaps arguably the most strategically indispensible in a conflict which had been suggested by the then Russian Defence Minister Pavel Grachev, as an opportunity to exhibit Russia's rapid deployment capabilities. The conclusions of both conflicts are a result of the Russian air force not being utilised effectively- or rather unable to be utilised to the extent required within a theatre of war constituted by counter insurgency combat. Nevertheless, Russian air power was used extensively and considered to be paramount in strategic discourse throughout both conflicts (Malek. M: 2009; 8-12)

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Document from the year 2013 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: 89.00, University of Nottingham, language: English, abstract: Since this document primarily focuses on the role of air power within the confines of the latter of the two conflicts, the analysis will be strictly related to just that as opposed to broader military operational analysis, only with occasional reference to the former conflict of 1994-1996. The role of Russian air power throughout the first conflict varies significantly when contrasted with that of the second. This, as will be discussed later, is primarily a result of the lessons learnt from the first conflict- which is generally conceded as a Russian operational failure since Chechnya still remained a de facto independent state following the declaration of the 'Khasavyurt Accords' resulting in a ceasefire in 1996. The second conflict on the other hand, can be considered, at least in operational terms, successful since Russia restored federal control of the territory. Defence cuts and structural problems within the Russian air force attributed to a defeat in the first conflict and a 'humiliating victory' (Haas, D.M: 2004; 1-18) in the second. Although the air force was not the only branch of the Russian military that faced defence cuts, it was perhaps arguably the most strategically indispensible in a conflict which had been suggested by the then Russian Defence Minister Pavel Grachev, as an opportunity to exhibit Russia's rapid deployment capabilities. The conclusions of both conflicts are a result of the Russian air force not being utilised effectively- or rather unable to be utilised to the extent required within a theatre of war constituted by counter insurgency combat. Nevertheless, Russian air power was used extensively and considered to be paramount in strategic discourse throughout both conflicts (Malek. M: 2009; 8-12)

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Portierung von Unix Open-Source-Software auf Mac OS X by william kealey
Cover of the book Das Thema Sterben und Tod in Kinderbüchern. 'Leb wohl lieber Dachs' von Susan Varley by william kealey
Cover of the book Balanced Scorecard. Innovatives Steuerungs- und Führungsinstrument im Unternehmen by william kealey
Cover of the book Essay zu Robert Altmans Film 'A Prairie Home Companion' (2006) by william kealey
Cover of the book Friedrich Nietzsche und Thomas S. Kuhn by william kealey
Cover of the book Vertriebsorientierte Datenaufbereitung für eine Soll-Ist-Analyse der Kosten by william kealey
Cover of the book Asymmetries in the Emerging Multilateral Trading System under the WTO: An Analysis by william kealey
Cover of the book Fußball-Live-Übertragung: Ein Erfolgsformat im deutschen Fernsehen by william kealey
Cover of the book Individualität, Kreativität und Notwendigkeit in der Fragestellung Richard Shustermans nach der Unterschiedlichkeit zwischen populärer Kunst und hoher Kunst by william kealey
Cover of the book The function of comic characters in THE CRIPPLE OF INISHMAAN by william kealey
Cover of the book Die politische Entmachtung der Hellenistischen Welt infolge der Schlacht bei Pydna 168 v. Chr. by william kealey
Cover of the book Strom aus regenerativen Energiesystemen by william kealey
Cover of the book Auswirkungen und Implementierung von Klettern im schulischen Kontext by william kealey
Cover of the book Das Subjekt und sein Name in der Kultur der Postmoderne - Subjekt-Bildung in der Postmoderne by william kealey
Cover of the book Political Advertising in den USA by william kealey
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy