Thinking Through Poetry

Field Reports on Romantic Lyric

Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism, Poetry History & Criticism, Theory
Cover of the book Thinking Through Poetry by Marjorie Levinson, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Marjorie Levinson ISBN: 9780192538253
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: July 12, 2018
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Marjorie Levinson
ISBN: 9780192538253
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: July 12, 2018
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

Thinking through Poetry: Field Reports on Romantic Lyric pursues two goals. The title signals the contribution to debates about reading. Do we think 'through' - 'by means of', 'with'- poems, sympathetically elaborating their surfaces? Is this compatible with a second meaning: 'thinking through' poems to their end-solving a problem, getting to its root, its deep truth? Third, can we square these surface and depth readings with a speculative, philosophical criticism to which the poem carries us, where 'through' denotes a 'going beyond?' All three meanings of 'through' are in play throughout. The subtitle applies 'field' first to Romantic studies since the 1980s, a field that this project reflects upon from beginning to end. Examples are drawn especially from Wordsworth, but also from Coleridge and, in assessing Romanticism's afterlife, from Stevens. 'Field' also characterizes the shift from a unitary to a field-concept of form during that time-span, a shift pursued through prolonged engagement with Spinoza. 'Field' thus underscores the synthesis of form and history, the importance of analytic scale to that synthesis, and the displacement of entity (text) by 'relation' as the object of investigation. While the book historically connects early nineteenth-century intellectual trends to twentieth- and twenty-first-century scientific revolutions, its focuses on introducing new models to literary criticism. Unlike accounts of the influence of science on literature, or various 'literature + X' approaches (literature and ecology, literature and cognitive science), it constructs its object of inquiry in a way cognate with work in non-humanities disciplines, thus highlighting a certain unity to human knowledge. The claim is that specialists in literature should think the way distinguished scientists think, and vice versa.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Thinking through Poetry: Field Reports on Romantic Lyric pursues two goals. The title signals the contribution to debates about reading. Do we think 'through' - 'by means of', 'with'- poems, sympathetically elaborating their surfaces? Is this compatible with a second meaning: 'thinking through' poems to their end-solving a problem, getting to its root, its deep truth? Third, can we square these surface and depth readings with a speculative, philosophical criticism to which the poem carries us, where 'through' denotes a 'going beyond?' All three meanings of 'through' are in play throughout. The subtitle applies 'field' first to Romantic studies since the 1980s, a field that this project reflects upon from beginning to end. Examples are drawn especially from Wordsworth, but also from Coleridge and, in assessing Romanticism's afterlife, from Stevens. 'Field' also characterizes the shift from a unitary to a field-concept of form during that time-span, a shift pursued through prolonged engagement with Spinoza. 'Field' thus underscores the synthesis of form and history, the importance of analytic scale to that synthesis, and the displacement of entity (text) by 'relation' as the object of investigation. While the book historically connects early nineteenth-century intellectual trends to twentieth- and twenty-first-century scientific revolutions, its focuses on introducing new models to literary criticism. Unlike accounts of the influence of science on literature, or various 'literature + X' approaches (literature and ecology, literature and cognitive science), it constructs its object of inquiry in a way cognate with work in non-humanities disciplines, thus highlighting a certain unity to human knowledge. The claim is that specialists in literature should think the way distinguished scientists think, and vice versa.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book The Thirty-Nine Steps by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book The Roman Martyrs by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book The Wild Ass's Skin by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book Work and Object by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book Compassionate Moral Realism by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of French Politics by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book East Wind by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book Robotics: A Very Short Introduction by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book The Invisible Hand? by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book A Modern Introduction to Quantum Field Theory by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book The Global History of Organic Farming by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book Political Rationale and International Consequences of the War in Libya by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book The Broken Voice by Marjorie Levinson
Cover of the book Confessions by Marjorie Levinson
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy