Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew

Minority Rights and Procedural Change in Legislative Politics

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew by George Douglas Dion, University of Michigan Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: George Douglas Dion ISBN: 9780472022694
Publisher: University of Michigan Press Publication: May 6, 2010
Imprint: University of Michigan Press Language: English
Author: George Douglas Dion
ISBN: 9780472022694
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
Publication: May 6, 2010
Imprint: University of Michigan Press
Language: English

The use of filibusters in the U.S. Senate by small numbers of members to prevent legislative action apparently desired by a majority of the members--as evidenced by the battles over civil rights legislation in the 1950s and 1960s--is legendary. Similar situations have existed in other legislative bodies over time. The fear that they will at some time be in the minority has inhibited actions by the majority groups to control the right of minority groups to block legislative action. And yet from time to time the majority in a legislative body has forced a change in the rules to control the rights of the minority. When does the majority seek to limit minority rights to obstruct legislation? Douglas Dion, in a unique study, develops a formal model to set out the conditions under which majorities will limit minority rights. He finds that when majorities are small, they will be more cohesive. This majority cohesion leads to minority obstruction, which in turn leads to majority efforts to force procedural change to control the ability of the minority to obstruct legislation. Dion then tests his findings in a rich consideration of historical cases from the nineteenth-century U.S. House of Representatives, the nineteenth- and twentieth-century U.S. Senate, the British House of Commons, and an account of the Austro-Hungarian Parliament written by Mark Twain.

Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew is a work that combines formal analysis with extensive historical evidence to address an important problem in democratic theory. Specialists in legislative politics and American political development, as well as those more broadly interested in the relationship between democratic theory and institutional structure, will find the work of great interest.

Douglas Dion is Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Michigan.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The use of filibusters in the U.S. Senate by small numbers of members to prevent legislative action apparently desired by a majority of the members--as evidenced by the battles over civil rights legislation in the 1950s and 1960s--is legendary. Similar situations have existed in other legislative bodies over time. The fear that they will at some time be in the minority has inhibited actions by the majority groups to control the right of minority groups to block legislative action. And yet from time to time the majority in a legislative body has forced a change in the rules to control the rights of the minority. When does the majority seek to limit minority rights to obstruct legislation? Douglas Dion, in a unique study, develops a formal model to set out the conditions under which majorities will limit minority rights. He finds that when majorities are small, they will be more cohesive. This majority cohesion leads to minority obstruction, which in turn leads to majority efforts to force procedural change to control the ability of the minority to obstruct legislation. Dion then tests his findings in a rich consideration of historical cases from the nineteenth-century U.S. House of Representatives, the nineteenth- and twentieth-century U.S. Senate, the British House of Commons, and an account of the Austro-Hungarian Parliament written by Mark Twain.

Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew is a work that combines formal analysis with extensive historical evidence to address an important problem in democratic theory. Specialists in legislative politics and American political development, as well as those more broadly interested in the relationship between democratic theory and institutional structure, will find the work of great interest.

Douglas Dion is Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Michigan.

More books from University of Michigan Press

Cover of the book The Political Economy of Regional Peacemaking by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book Seven Stories of Threatening Speech by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book Philadelphia Freedom by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book Pastplay by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book College Knowledge for the Student Athlete by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book Drones and Support for the Use of Force by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book Adoption in America by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book Material Witness by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book Culture in the Anteroom by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book Party Discipline in the U.S. House of Representatives by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book When Informal Institutions Change by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book Chamber Music by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book Writing History in the Digital Age by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book The Republican Aventine and Rome’s Social Order by George Douglas Dion
Cover of the book The Unreal Estate Guide to Detroit by George Douglas Dion
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy