Welfare for the Wealthy

Parties, Social Spending, and Inequality in the United States

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, Social Science, Business & Finance
Cover of the book Welfare for the Wealthy by Christopher G. Faricy, Cambridge University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Christopher G. Faricy ISBN: 9781316349458
Publisher: Cambridge University Press Publication: October 22, 2015
Imprint: Cambridge University Press Language: English
Author: Christopher G. Faricy
ISBN: 9781316349458
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication: October 22, 2015
Imprint: Cambridge University Press
Language: English

How does political party control determine changes to social policy, and by extension, influence inequality in America? Conventional theories show that Democratic control of the federal government produces more social expenditures and less inequality. Welfare for the Wealthy re-examines this relationship by evaluating how political party power results in changes to both public social spending and subsidies for private welfare - and how a trade-off between the two, in turn, affects income inequality. Christopher Faricy finds that both Democrats and Republicans have increased social spending over the last forty-two years. And while both political parties increase federal social spending, Democrats and Republicans differ in how they spend federal money, which socioeconomic groups benefit, and the resulting consequences for income inequality.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

How does political party control determine changes to social policy, and by extension, influence inequality in America? Conventional theories show that Democratic control of the federal government produces more social expenditures and less inequality. Welfare for the Wealthy re-examines this relationship by evaluating how political party power results in changes to both public social spending and subsidies for private welfare - and how a trade-off between the two, in turn, affects income inequality. Christopher Faricy finds that both Democrats and Republicans have increased social spending over the last forty-two years. And while both political parties increase federal social spending, Democrats and Republicans differ in how they spend federal money, which socioeconomic groups benefit, and the resulting consequences for income inequality.

More books from Cambridge University Press

Cover of the book Bandung, Global History, and International Law by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book An Underground History of Early Victorian Fiction by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Human Beings in International Relations by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Chaotic Dynamics by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Hedge Fund Activism in Japan by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Muhammad's Heirs by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Foundations of Dynamic Economic Analysis by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Stefan Wolpe and the Avant-Garde Diaspora by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Bayesian Probability Theory by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book The Aesthetics of Emotion by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Stahl's Self-Assessment Examination in Psychiatry by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Language and Television Series by Christopher G. Faricy
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy