What Is at Stake in Building “Non-Western” International Relations Theory?

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Relations
Cover of the book What Is at Stake in Building “Non-Western” International Relations Theory? by Yong-Soo Eun, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Yong-Soo Eun ISBN: 9781351982696
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: January 12, 2018
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Yong-Soo Eun
ISBN: 9781351982696
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: January 12, 2018
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

International Relations (IR) as a discipline is often deemed to be “too Western” centric. It has been argued that much of mainstream IR theory is “simply an abstraction of Western history.” In this respect, many IR scholars have called for “broadening” the theoretical horizon of IR while problematising the Western parochialism of the discipline, and it is increasingly acknowledged that IR needs to embrace a wider range of histories, experiences, and theoretical perspectives, particularly those outside of the West. However, despite such a meaningful debate over broadening the theoretical and practical horizons of IR, several critical questions remain unclear and under-explored. For example, does IR need to embrace pluralism? If so, how much? To what extent, and in what sense, is IR parochial? Should IR promote dialogue across theoretical and spatial divides? If so, how? Yong-Soo Eun addresses these questions. He undertakes a literature review and an empirical analysis of the extent to which the field has actually become diverse and pluralistic. This investigation considers diversity beyond the current limited focus on the geographical origins of theory. Yong-Soo also draws attention to the mechanisms and processes of knowledge production and transmission in IR. More importantly, he addresses what is probably the most acute issue associated with the “non-Western” IR theory-building enterprise; namely, fragmentation and dialogue. In conclusion, Yong-Soo notes that the role of unsettling the present hierarchical structure of the discipline falls to reflexive individual agents. He argues that in order for their agential power to be more fully harnessed in the opening up of IR, critical “self”-reflection and “collective” empathy and collaboration among marginalised scholars are all essential.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

International Relations (IR) as a discipline is often deemed to be “too Western” centric. It has been argued that much of mainstream IR theory is “simply an abstraction of Western history.” In this respect, many IR scholars have called for “broadening” the theoretical horizon of IR while problematising the Western parochialism of the discipline, and it is increasingly acknowledged that IR needs to embrace a wider range of histories, experiences, and theoretical perspectives, particularly those outside of the West. However, despite such a meaningful debate over broadening the theoretical and practical horizons of IR, several critical questions remain unclear and under-explored. For example, does IR need to embrace pluralism? If so, how much? To what extent, and in what sense, is IR parochial? Should IR promote dialogue across theoretical and spatial divides? If so, how? Yong-Soo Eun addresses these questions. He undertakes a literature review and an empirical analysis of the extent to which the field has actually become diverse and pluralistic. This investigation considers diversity beyond the current limited focus on the geographical origins of theory. Yong-Soo also draws attention to the mechanisms and processes of knowledge production and transmission in IR. More importantly, he addresses what is probably the most acute issue associated with the “non-Western” IR theory-building enterprise; namely, fragmentation and dialogue. In conclusion, Yong-Soo notes that the role of unsettling the present hierarchical structure of the discipline falls to reflexive individual agents. He argues that in order for their agential power to be more fully harnessed in the opening up of IR, critical “self”-reflection and “collective” empathy and collaboration among marginalised scholars are all essential.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book A History of Private Bill Legislation by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Geography and Genealogy by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Recovering Intimacy in Love Relationships by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Consolidation Policies in Federal States by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Regime Stability in Saudi Arabia by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Leadership Paradoxes by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Selves, Persons, Individuals by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book The Funding Revolution by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book The Rhetorical Nature of XML by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Gaetano Donizetti by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Dynamic Embodiment for Social Theory by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Resistance in the Desert by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Global Concepts for Young People by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Outlooks by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book The Ghetto in Global History by Yong-Soo Eun
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy