Where Economics Went Wrong

Chicago's Abandonment of Classical Liberalism

Business & Finance, Economics, Theory of Economics, Economic History
Cover of the book Where Economics Went Wrong by David Colander, Craig Freedman, Princeton University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: David Colander, Craig Freedman ISBN: 9780691184050
Publisher: Princeton University Press Publication: November 27, 2018
Imprint: Princeton University Press Language: English
Author: David Colander, Craig Freedman
ISBN: 9780691184050
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Publication: November 27, 2018
Imprint: Princeton University Press
Language: English

How modern economics abandoned classical liberalism and lost its way

Milton Friedman once predicted that advances in scientific economics would resolve debates about whether raising the minimum wage is good policy. Decades later, Friedman’s prediction has not come true. In Where Economics Went Wrong, David Colander and Craig Freedman argue that it never will. Why? Because economic policy, when done correctly, is an art and a craft. It is not, and cannot be, a science. The authors explain why classical liberal economists understood this essential difference, why modern economists abandoned it, and why now is the time for the profession to return to its classical liberal roots.

Carefully distinguishing policy from science and theory, classical liberal economists emphasized values and context, treating economic policy analysis as a moral science where a dialogue of sensibilities and judgments allowed for the same scientific basis to arrive at a variety of policy recommendations. Using the University of Chicago—one of the last bastions of classical liberal economics—as a case study, Colander and Freedman examine how both the MIT and Chicago variants of modern economics eschewed classical liberalism in their attempt to make economic policy analysis a science. By examining the way in which the discipline managed to lose its bearings, the authors delve into such issues as the development of welfare economics in relation to economic science, alternative voices within the Chicago School, and exactly how Friedman got it wrong.

Contending that the division between science and prescription needs to be restored, Where Economics Went Wrong makes the case for a more nuanced and self-aware policy analysis by economists.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

How modern economics abandoned classical liberalism and lost its way

Milton Friedman once predicted that advances in scientific economics would resolve debates about whether raising the minimum wage is good policy. Decades later, Friedman’s prediction has not come true. In Where Economics Went Wrong, David Colander and Craig Freedman argue that it never will. Why? Because economic policy, when done correctly, is an art and a craft. It is not, and cannot be, a science. The authors explain why classical liberal economists understood this essential difference, why modern economists abandoned it, and why now is the time for the profession to return to its classical liberal roots.

Carefully distinguishing policy from science and theory, classical liberal economists emphasized values and context, treating economic policy analysis as a moral science where a dialogue of sensibilities and judgments allowed for the same scientific basis to arrive at a variety of policy recommendations. Using the University of Chicago—one of the last bastions of classical liberal economics—as a case study, Colander and Freedman examine how both the MIT and Chicago variants of modern economics eschewed classical liberalism in their attempt to make economic policy analysis a science. By examining the way in which the discipline managed to lose its bearings, the authors delve into such issues as the development of welfare economics in relation to economic science, alternative voices within the Chicago School, and exactly how Friedman got it wrong.

Contending that the division between science and prescription needs to be restored, Where Economics Went Wrong makes the case for a more nuanced and self-aware policy analysis by economists.

More books from Princeton University Press

Cover of the book Worse Than a Monolith by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book (God) After Auschwitz by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book The Best Writing on Mathematics 2013 by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book American Babylon by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Italo Calvino by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Confronting Political Islam by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Religious Experience Reconsidered by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Fragile by Design by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Reading Machiavelli by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Following the Wild Bees by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Local Histories/Global Designs by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book The Logician and the Engineer by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book What Is "Your" Race? by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Discoverers of the Universe by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Anthropos Today by David Colander, Craig Freedman
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy