Work in Progress

Literary Revision as Social Performance in Ancient Rome

Nonfiction, History, Ancient History, Rome, Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism
Cover of the book Work in Progress by Sean Alexander Gurd, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Sean Alexander Gurd ISBN: 9780190208714
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: December 6, 2011
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Sean Alexander Gurd
ISBN: 9780190208714
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: December 6, 2011
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

Work in Progress offers an in-depth study of the role of literary revision in the compositional practices and representational strategies of Roman authors at the end of the republic and the beginning of the principate. It focuses on Cicero, Horace, Quintilian, Martial, and Pliny the Younger, but also offers discussions of Isocrates, Plato, and Hellenistic poetry. The book's central argument is that revision made textuality into a medium of social exchange. Revisions were not always made by authors working alone: often, they were the result of conversations between an author and friends or literary contacts, and these conversations exemplified a commitment to collective debate and active collaboration. Revision was thus much more than an unavoidable element in literary genesis: it was one way in which authorship became a form of social agency. Consequently, when we think about revision for authors of the late republic and early empire we should not think solely of painstaking attendance to craft aimed exclusively at the perfection of a literary work. Nor should we think of the resulting texts as closed and invariant statements sent from an author to his reader. So long as an author was still willing to revise, his text served as a temporary platform around and in which a community came into being. The theories of revision that guide the author's study come from the new genetic criticism that has been successfully applied, especially in Europe, to modern authors. While many of the tools of analysis applicable to modern authors (author-written manuscripts, corrected proofs, etc.) are not available for ancient authors, Sean Gurd has amassed a surprising number of passages in ancient texts about revision, its importance to the author, and the circle of critics involved in the process of rewriting.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Work in Progress offers an in-depth study of the role of literary revision in the compositional practices and representational strategies of Roman authors at the end of the republic and the beginning of the principate. It focuses on Cicero, Horace, Quintilian, Martial, and Pliny the Younger, but also offers discussions of Isocrates, Plato, and Hellenistic poetry. The book's central argument is that revision made textuality into a medium of social exchange. Revisions were not always made by authors working alone: often, they were the result of conversations between an author and friends or literary contacts, and these conversations exemplified a commitment to collective debate and active collaboration. Revision was thus much more than an unavoidable element in literary genesis: it was one way in which authorship became a form of social agency. Consequently, when we think about revision for authors of the late republic and early empire we should not think solely of painstaking attendance to craft aimed exclusively at the perfection of a literary work. Nor should we think of the resulting texts as closed and invariant statements sent from an author to his reader. So long as an author was still willing to revise, his text served as a temporary platform around and in which a community came into being. The theories of revision that guide the author's study come from the new genetic criticism that has been successfully applied, especially in Europe, to modern authors. While many of the tools of analysis applicable to modern authors (author-written manuscripts, corrected proofs, etc.) are not available for ancient authors, Sean Gurd has amassed a surprising number of passages in ancient texts about revision, its importance to the author, and the circle of critics involved in the process of rewriting.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Words Onscreen by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book Love by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book The Modern Mercenary by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book The Afghan Way of War by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book Consciousness and the Social Brain by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book Globalization and the New Politics of Embedded Liberalism by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book Advancing Evidence-Based Practice Through Program Evaluation by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book For Peace and Money by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book Age of Innocence - With Audio Level 5 Oxford Bookworms Library by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book Yellowstone's Destabilized Ecosystem by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book American Arsenal by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book Why the Civil War Came by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book Brain, Body, and Mind by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book Tooth and Claw - Short Stories Level 3 Oxford Bookworms Library by Sean Alexander Gurd
Cover of the book Sustainable Security by Sean Alexander Gurd
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy