An Analysis of Post 9/11 Presidential Rhetoric - Lead-up to the Iraq War

Lead-up to the Iraq War

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Drama, Anthologies
Cover of the book An Analysis of Post 9/11 Presidential Rhetoric - Lead-up to the Iraq War by Marc Weinrich, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Marc Weinrich ISBN: 9783640668380
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: July 23, 2010
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Marc Weinrich
ISBN: 9783640668380
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: July 23, 2010
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Bachelor Thesis from the year 2009 in the subject American Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,0, University of Hildesheim (English Department), language: English, abstract: On the morning of May 1st, 2003 President George W. Bush landed on the aircraft carrier U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln off the coast of San Diego, California, announcing from its deck that 'major combat operations in Iraq have ended' (George W. Bush, May 1st, 2003). On the prominent banner behind him, it said: 'Mission Accomplished'. The war had only begun one and a half months prior to this event and currently (October, 2009) American troops are still deployed and involved in combat in Iraq. The mission of the Iraq war was certainly not accomplished on May 1, 2003. What the Bush Administration had accomplished, was something else, however: they convinced the majority of the American people of the necessity of this war, which was reflected in polls, at that time. According to the Gallup Poll, 75% of all Americans approved of sending American troops to Iraq in March, 2003 (Gallup, 2009). Americans were told that the Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein, possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and, therefore, was a threat to the United States. However, to date, no weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq, although their alleged existence was one of the main reasons for going to war. The Bush Administration managed to make the vast majority of Americans believe this false assumption. The goal of this paper is to explore how a U.S. president, who was not considered a good speaker, nevertheless succeeded in convincing the American citizens that going to war was the 'right thing to do'. In this paper, it will, first, be briefly outlined what role presidential rhetoric plays, then the post-9/11 rhetoric of the Bush Administration and its circumstances will be examined. An attempt will be made to prove that the rhetoric of the Bush Administration was the key to the high level of support from the U.S. population, for the invasion of Iraq. An analysis will be provided of speeches given by George W. Bush where it will be explored how exactly language and rhetoric was used to shape public opinion and therefore pave for this invasion and, subsequently, the war. This analysis is conducted, using a corpus that was created containing all presidential speeches given between the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and the beginning of the Iraq war in March, 2003. A conclusion will be drawn from this in the last section, explaining how the presidential rhetoric shaped public opinion.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Bachelor Thesis from the year 2009 in the subject American Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,0, University of Hildesheim (English Department), language: English, abstract: On the morning of May 1st, 2003 President George W. Bush landed on the aircraft carrier U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln off the coast of San Diego, California, announcing from its deck that 'major combat operations in Iraq have ended' (George W. Bush, May 1st, 2003). On the prominent banner behind him, it said: 'Mission Accomplished'. The war had only begun one and a half months prior to this event and currently (October, 2009) American troops are still deployed and involved in combat in Iraq. The mission of the Iraq war was certainly not accomplished on May 1, 2003. What the Bush Administration had accomplished, was something else, however: they convinced the majority of the American people of the necessity of this war, which was reflected in polls, at that time. According to the Gallup Poll, 75% of all Americans approved of sending American troops to Iraq in March, 2003 (Gallup, 2009). Americans were told that the Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein, possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and, therefore, was a threat to the United States. However, to date, no weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq, although their alleged existence was one of the main reasons for going to war. The Bush Administration managed to make the vast majority of Americans believe this false assumption. The goal of this paper is to explore how a U.S. president, who was not considered a good speaker, nevertheless succeeded in convincing the American citizens that going to war was the 'right thing to do'. In this paper, it will, first, be briefly outlined what role presidential rhetoric plays, then the post-9/11 rhetoric of the Bush Administration and its circumstances will be examined. An attempt will be made to prove that the rhetoric of the Bush Administration was the key to the high level of support from the U.S. population, for the invasion of Iraq. An analysis will be provided of speeches given by George W. Bush where it will be explored how exactly language and rhetoric was used to shape public opinion and therefore pave for this invasion and, subsequently, the war. This analysis is conducted, using a corpus that was created containing all presidential speeches given between the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and the beginning of the Iraq war in March, 2003. A conclusion will be drawn from this in the last section, explaining how the presidential rhetoric shaped public opinion.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Kultur à la Clifford Geertz - der Ethnologe als Autor by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book How Can We Create the Right Organizational Context to Sell Environmental Sustainability as a Strategic Issue to Top Management? by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book What do project managers really do? Do they push their projects and lead their people? by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book 'Deep and Pure for a Symbol' by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book Oscar Wilde: The Picture of Dorian Gray - Youth Cult and Illusion of Beauty. The new Hedonism in Light of our Society of Experience by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book Introduction to Thomas Robert Malthus by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book Unemployment and delinquency by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book The value of a firm by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book User Perception of Targeted Ads in Online Social Networks by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book Feminism of Woman Teachers in the First Half of the 20th Century by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book Heroes of a different kind. 'The Bigger-Than-Life'-John Wayne versus the 'Man with no Name'-Clint Eastwood by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book The Psychodrama in Drama Pedagogy by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book Retail marketing and new retail idea - Marks & Spencer by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book The oversight of the audit profession by Marc Weinrich
Cover of the book John Dos Passos´s 'The Big Money': Critical Perceptions of the United States during the 1920s by Marc Weinrich
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy