Antitrust Implications of Technology Consortia

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Business
Cover of the book Antitrust Implications of Technology Consortia by Andreas Seip, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Andreas Seip ISBN: 9783638231633
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: November 10, 2003
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Andreas Seip
ISBN: 9783638231633
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: November 10, 2003
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Master's Thesis from the year 2003 in the subject Law - Civil / Private / Trade / Anti Trust Law / Business Law, grade: Distinction (14 of 15), University of Bonn (Centre for European Integration Research, Bonn), course: Centre for European Integration Research, Bonn, 89 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The Competitiveness Council (Erkki Liikanen from DG Enterprise and Information Society, Philippe Busquin from DG Research and Mario Monti from DG Competition meeting at Brussels on November 26, 2002) emphasized the need to create a European Research Area, which is to be understood as a true internal market for science and knowledge. It is particularly important to ensure consistency between the national and the EU Research and Development (R&D) policies in order to increase investment in research and enhance the innovation and technology transfer capacity. In boosting the potential of the European Research Area certain framework conditions need to be transposed into practice among which 'a competitive environment with research and innovation-friendly regulations and competition rules' is the most relevant to the present thesis. Although technology consortia are rarely subject to antitrust scrutiny, guidance is needed for a number of reasons. The very peculiar nature of technology consortia can make it hard, if not impossible, to characterize a consortium into specific categories such as horizontal, vertical or conglomerate, which in turn makes it difficult to clearly delineate any antitrust concerns. Furthermore, the European competition law regime is in a crucial transformation process. With effect of 1 May 2004, the date of entering into force of Regulation 1/2003 the whole of Article 81 will be directly applicable in the member states. Thus any anti-competitive agreement is no longer to be notified to the Commission for a compatibility assessment under Article 81(3). Instead companies will have to assess the compatibility of their agreement with Article 81 on their own. In seeking guidance, the Commission likes to refer to its forty year long decisional practice during which it has had the monopoly to handle notified cases in respect of Article 81(3). Not surprisingly, uncertainties still remain. This is not to say that the decisions are not helpful, but rather that law is subject to interpretational developments. It is particularly competition law that is rightfully influenced by economics and must be determined in the individual setting. The law can not therefore provide answers to all issues that have arisen due to commercial developments and changing technology, which is why guidance on specific industry aspects actually adds value. [...]

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Master's Thesis from the year 2003 in the subject Law - Civil / Private / Trade / Anti Trust Law / Business Law, grade: Distinction (14 of 15), University of Bonn (Centre for European Integration Research, Bonn), course: Centre for European Integration Research, Bonn, 89 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The Competitiveness Council (Erkki Liikanen from DG Enterprise and Information Society, Philippe Busquin from DG Research and Mario Monti from DG Competition meeting at Brussels on November 26, 2002) emphasized the need to create a European Research Area, which is to be understood as a true internal market for science and knowledge. It is particularly important to ensure consistency between the national and the EU Research and Development (R&D) policies in order to increase investment in research and enhance the innovation and technology transfer capacity. In boosting the potential of the European Research Area certain framework conditions need to be transposed into practice among which 'a competitive environment with research and innovation-friendly regulations and competition rules' is the most relevant to the present thesis. Although technology consortia are rarely subject to antitrust scrutiny, guidance is needed for a number of reasons. The very peculiar nature of technology consortia can make it hard, if not impossible, to characterize a consortium into specific categories such as horizontal, vertical or conglomerate, which in turn makes it difficult to clearly delineate any antitrust concerns. Furthermore, the European competition law regime is in a crucial transformation process. With effect of 1 May 2004, the date of entering into force of Regulation 1/2003 the whole of Article 81 will be directly applicable in the member states. Thus any anti-competitive agreement is no longer to be notified to the Commission for a compatibility assessment under Article 81(3). Instead companies will have to assess the compatibility of their agreement with Article 81 on their own. In seeking guidance, the Commission likes to refer to its forty year long decisional practice during which it has had the monopoly to handle notified cases in respect of Article 81(3). Not surprisingly, uncertainties still remain. This is not to say that the decisions are not helpful, but rather that law is subject to interpretational developments. It is particularly competition law that is rightfully influenced by economics and must be determined in the individual setting. The law can not therefore provide answers to all issues that have arisen due to commercial developments and changing technology, which is why guidance on specific industry aspects actually adds value. [...]

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Can Market be Truly Global? by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book Jugend und Jugendkulturen im 21. Jahrhundert by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book Death Penalty - Essay by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book Rating learners of English as a foreign language: Rating Scales vs. Rapid Profile by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book Managing Working Capital; it depends upon the type of retail business? by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book Zadie Smith's 'White Teeth' - Irie as an example for 2nd generation immigrants' desperate search for their place in a multicultural society by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book Logistics industry in UK by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book The development of corpus linguistics to its present-day concept by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book Universals in facial expression by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book An Ethical Debate on Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Human Dignity or Research Freedom? by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book Zu: F. Scott Fitzgerald´s 'The Ice Palace' - A Story of Initiation by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book Zadie Smith 'White Teeth' and Multiculturalism by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book Modernism in 'The Day of the Locust' (1939) by Nathanael West by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book Theorie und Praxis der deutschen Landerziehungsheime unter der Leitung von Hermann Lietz by Andreas Seip
Cover of the book Beyond Archangel - The Archangel Theme in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein by Andreas Seip
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy