Believing Against the Evidence

Agency and the Ethics of Belief

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Pragmatism, Epistemology
Cover of the book Believing Against the Evidence by Miriam Schleifer McCormick, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Miriam Schleifer McCormick ISBN: 9781136682759
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: October 30, 2014
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Miriam Schleifer McCormick
ISBN: 9781136682759
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: October 30, 2014
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

The question of whether it is ever permissible to believe on insufficient evidence has once again become a live question. Greater attention is now being paid to practical dimensions of belief, namely issues related to epistemic virtue, doxastic responsibility, and voluntarism.

In this book, McCormick argues that the standards used to evaluate beliefs are not isolated from other evaluative domains. The ultimate criteria for assessing beliefs are the same as those for assessing action because beliefs and actions are both products of agency. Two important implications of this thesis, both of which deviate from the dominant view in contemporary philosophy, are 1) it can be permissible (and possible) to believe for non-evidential reasons, and 2) we have a robust control over many of our beliefs, a control sufficient to ground attributions of responsibility for belief.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The question of whether it is ever permissible to believe on insufficient evidence has once again become a live question. Greater attention is now being paid to practical dimensions of belief, namely issues related to epistemic virtue, doxastic responsibility, and voluntarism.

In this book, McCormick argues that the standards used to evaluate beliefs are not isolated from other evaluative domains. The ultimate criteria for assessing beliefs are the same as those for assessing action because beliefs and actions are both products of agency. Two important implications of this thesis, both of which deviate from the dominant view in contemporary philosophy, are 1) it can be permissible (and possible) to believe for non-evidential reasons, and 2) we have a robust control over many of our beliefs, a control sufficient to ground attributions of responsibility for belief.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Entrepreneurship and Sustainability by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book Where Did We Go Wrong? by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book Armana Age by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book Essays and Addresses on Arab Laws by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book Colloquial Afrikaans by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book Overcoming the Stigma of Intimate Partner Abuse by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book Singing and Wellbeing by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book International Environmental Treaties and State Behavior by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book Learning as a Creative and Developmental Process in Higher Education by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book Planning Futures by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book Teaching History Creatively by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book Outdoor and Experiential Learning by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book The Principles of Pleasure by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book Profiles of People in Power by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
Cover of the book The Gondi by Miriam Schleifer McCormick
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy