Does an enlargement of the European Union inhibit the party establishment of a European party system? Case study of Turkey

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Does an enlargement of the European Union inhibit the party establishment of a European party system? Case study of Turkey by Daniel Schmidt, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Daniel Schmidt ISBN: 9783638050579
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: May 20, 2008
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Daniel Schmidt
ISBN: 9783638050579
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: May 20, 2008
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 2,0, University of Twente (Political Institute ), 26 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: 1. Introduction The European Union (EU) has been a very heterogeneous building since the start. The difficult task is forming a party system which fits the different national parties in coalitions that are able to produce results. With the now 25 members this seems even more problematic, since the states of Eastern Europe have a tradition that differs significantly from the countries in Northern and Western Europe. It is, therefore, necessary to prove if party cohesion on the European level exists. If members of European Parliament (EP) would only vote on national interest, party coalitions would not serve their purpose. There needs to be cohesion towards the coalition in order to establish real European elections instead of second order national elections. In order to achieve this it is also necessary to be able to have a public opinion that can be organized into majorities (Beetham/Lord, 2001:77). The questions, therefore, remain if the EU is able to establish even more members in its middle. It might be the case that new members would decline the party cohesion even further and that would make It even more difficult to establish true European elections. In this paper, special emphasis will be on the role of Turkey and the adoptability into the party system. The leading hypotheses will be that the cleavages lines which are important for Turkish voters are too different in order to adopt to leading European ideas. A sup-question is also if the Eastern European countries have yet performed this step. The paper will start with a normative frame that points out how an ideal democracy could work on the European level. Because of shortage of space this can not be discussed in total depth, but the presented ideas will serve as a framework. After the theoretical part, the focus will be on the European system as it works today. Special emphasis will be on the party coalitions and their impact on the voting behaviour of members of parliament (MEP). It is essential to describe why national parties have agreed to work together and what political solutions they prefer. Since there are seven coalitions in the EP today, not all can be fully analysed. Therefore, the two biggest groups (EVP-ED and SPE) will mainly be the focus, since they hold over 60% of the seats. The next part will analyse the Turkish system and what kind of issues are deciding for Turkish voters. The history of democracy will be the starting point of this analysis before the present situation will be the focus. The conclusion will, therefore, be based on the question if Turkey's party system can adapt to the EU, and, thus, the entry of Turkey into the EU is feasible taking these conditions into account.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 2,0, University of Twente (Political Institute ), 26 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: 1. Introduction The European Union (EU) has been a very heterogeneous building since the start. The difficult task is forming a party system which fits the different national parties in coalitions that are able to produce results. With the now 25 members this seems even more problematic, since the states of Eastern Europe have a tradition that differs significantly from the countries in Northern and Western Europe. It is, therefore, necessary to prove if party cohesion on the European level exists. If members of European Parliament (EP) would only vote on national interest, party coalitions would not serve their purpose. There needs to be cohesion towards the coalition in order to establish real European elections instead of second order national elections. In order to achieve this it is also necessary to be able to have a public opinion that can be organized into majorities (Beetham/Lord, 2001:77). The questions, therefore, remain if the EU is able to establish even more members in its middle. It might be the case that new members would decline the party cohesion even further and that would make It even more difficult to establish true European elections. In this paper, special emphasis will be on the role of Turkey and the adoptability into the party system. The leading hypotheses will be that the cleavages lines which are important for Turkish voters are too different in order to adopt to leading European ideas. A sup-question is also if the Eastern European countries have yet performed this step. The paper will start with a normative frame that points out how an ideal democracy could work on the European level. Because of shortage of space this can not be discussed in total depth, but the presented ideas will serve as a framework. After the theoretical part, the focus will be on the European system as it works today. Special emphasis will be on the party coalitions and their impact on the voting behaviour of members of parliament (MEP). It is essential to describe why national parties have agreed to work together and what political solutions they prefer. Since there are seven coalitions in the EP today, not all can be fully analysed. Therefore, the two biggest groups (EVP-ED and SPE) will mainly be the focus, since they hold over 60% of the seats. The next part will analyse the Turkish system and what kind of issues are deciding for Turkish voters. The history of democracy will be the starting point of this analysis before the present situation will be the focus. The conclusion will, therefore, be based on the question if Turkey's party system can adapt to the EU, and, thus, the entry of Turkey into the EU is feasible taking these conditions into account.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Le relativisme et la métaphysique dans le conte philosophique 'Micromégas' de Voltaire by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book James Joyce's 'Finnegans Wake' and the Aesthetics of the Grotesque by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book Poland's Phyrric victory over bribery and collusion on its way to the European Union by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book Keep the Balance right - Ethical issues and the view to quarantine during the SARS outbreak by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book The magic of Disneyland by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book Case Analysis RealNetworks - RealNetworks still hot in business? by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book Crime, Disorder, and Justice - The Labelling Theory As A Way of Explaining Social Reactions To Deviant Behaviour by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book The Rise of Islam by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book The Contribution of Porter and Kramer's Concept of Creating Shared Value to CSR Theory by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book Jews in Iran since the revolution of 1979 by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book International Celebrity Endorsement in the case of l'Oréal by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book 'Chicano English' and 'Türkendeutsch': A comparison of two ethnic dialects by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book Analysis of the structure, contrasts, and complex of the lost love in The Raven by Edgar Allan Poe by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book Die gemeinsame Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik (GASP) der Europäischen Union by Daniel Schmidt
Cover of the book Account for differences in the development of physical education in Britain and Germany in the nineteenth century by Daniel Schmidt
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy