How useful is teamwork as a method of doing work?

Business & Finance, Management & Leadership, Management
Cover of the book How useful is teamwork as a method of doing work? by Jonas Augustin, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Jonas Augustin ISBN: 9783640945399
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: June 28, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Jonas Augustin
ISBN: 9783640945399
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: June 28, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Essay from the year 2007 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, grade: 2,0, Lancaster University, language: English, abstract: decisions can be biased by the ambition of forming a consistent team, which blocks the team members' ability to think rationally. Further disadvantages mentioned by Boddy (2005) are the idea that teams could become too independent from their organisation by developing their own dynamics and the fact that teamwork takes too much time since decisions are mainly made by time consuming discussions However, the actual use of teamwork as a method of doing work is not merely a question about the advantages and disadvantages of teamwork. In fact, it should be examined in two different dimensions - the effectiveness and the efficiency of teamwork. The initial question should therefore be divided into two parts: is teamwork effective in a way that the team achieves the goals that were set? And how many resources have to be spent to achieve these goals? The first question has already been answered. Teams are highly effective. All team members bring in different values, skills and experiences. The results of teams are therefore based on a much broader background compared to those of working groups, which essentially means that team results are more effective. There may be situations where working groups deliver results of almost the same quality but those are rare. Boddy (2005) mentions, in this context, small technical problems, that could be resolved by independently working people. Katzenbach and Smith (1993a) believe that teams outperform working groups especially when the task requires both multiple skills and experience. The second question is not as easy to answer. The literature on teamwork has deeply analysed the notion of effectiveness of teams. But the question about their efficiency has found little attention. In order to assess the efficiency of teamwork I want to have a more detailed look on the problems arising from it. At this point, I need to point out that all the assertions about the advantages of teamwork and its effectiveness are based on the assumptions that the team members work perfectly or at least well together, i.e. that they are implemented correctly. Non-functioning teams can cause serious damage to both the team members and the organisation they belong to. Therefore, it is absolutely vital that the problems that can arise from teamwork are solved promptly. A problem that no one takes care of can delete all benefits of teamwork.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2007 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, grade: 2,0, Lancaster University, language: English, abstract: decisions can be biased by the ambition of forming a consistent team, which blocks the team members' ability to think rationally. Further disadvantages mentioned by Boddy (2005) are the idea that teams could become too independent from their organisation by developing their own dynamics and the fact that teamwork takes too much time since decisions are mainly made by time consuming discussions However, the actual use of teamwork as a method of doing work is not merely a question about the advantages and disadvantages of teamwork. In fact, it should be examined in two different dimensions - the effectiveness and the efficiency of teamwork. The initial question should therefore be divided into two parts: is teamwork effective in a way that the team achieves the goals that were set? And how many resources have to be spent to achieve these goals? The first question has already been answered. Teams are highly effective. All team members bring in different values, skills and experiences. The results of teams are therefore based on a much broader background compared to those of working groups, which essentially means that team results are more effective. There may be situations where working groups deliver results of almost the same quality but those are rare. Boddy (2005) mentions, in this context, small technical problems, that could be resolved by independently working people. Katzenbach and Smith (1993a) believe that teams outperform working groups especially when the task requires both multiple skills and experience. The second question is not as easy to answer. The literature on teamwork has deeply analysed the notion of effectiveness of teams. But the question about their efficiency has found little attention. In order to assess the efficiency of teamwork I want to have a more detailed look on the problems arising from it. At this point, I need to point out that all the assertions about the advantages of teamwork and its effectiveness are based on the assumptions that the team members work perfectly or at least well together, i.e. that they are implemented correctly. Non-functioning teams can cause serious damage to both the team members and the organisation they belong to. Therefore, it is absolutely vital that the problems that can arise from teamwork are solved promptly. A problem that no one takes care of can delete all benefits of teamwork.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Leitbild der Einelternfamilie im Wandel der Zeit seit 1960 by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in Jordan. Challenges and Obstacles by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Strukturwandel in Ostdeutschland nach der Wiedervereinigung by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Unternehmensbewertung beim Börsengang by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Chancen und Risiken von eProcurement in Industriebetrieben by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Migranten im Polizeidienst by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Landwirtschaft, Liberalisierung und Umwelt: Umwelteffekte landwirtschaftlicher Liberalisierungen und Politikreformen in den USA und der EU by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Wasted Talent in 'The Bluest Eye' by Toni Morrison by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Das Erleben und Verhalten der Controller in der Interaktion mit dem Management by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Rolle des ägyptischen Militärs und der Muslimbrüder in der Januar-Revolution 2011 by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Wasserrechtliche Bewirtschaftungsziele und die Entwässerung von Straßen nach dem Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofs vom 1. Juli 2015 (C-461/13) und der Novellierung der Oberflächengewässerverordnung by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Die Inhaltsanalyse by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Unterrichtsstunde: Martinslegende - Erfahrung des Teilens (2. Klasse) by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book n-Personen-Spiele by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Die Bedeutung der Dispokinese für die Behandlung von Musikerkrankheiten. Methoden der Körperarbeit beim Musiklernen by Jonas Augustin
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy