Judging the Boy Scouts of America

Gay Rights, Freedom of Association, and the Dale Case

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Constitutional, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Gender Studies, Gay Studies
Cover of the book Judging the Boy Scouts of America by Richard J. Ellis, University Press of Kansas
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Richard J. Ellis ISBN: 9780700619849
Publisher: University Press of Kansas Publication: May 23, 2014
Imprint: University Press of Kansas Language: English
Author: Richard J. Ellis
ISBN: 9780700619849
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
Publication: May 23, 2014
Imprint: University Press of Kansas
Language: English

As Americans, we cherish the freedom to associate. However, with the freedom to associate comes the right to exclude those who do not share our values and goals. What happens when the freedom of association collides with the equally cherished principle that every individual should be free from invidious discrimination? This is precisely the question posed in Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale, a lawsuit that made its way through the courts over the course of a decade, culminating in 2000 with a landmark ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Judging the Boy Scouts of America, Richard J. Ellis tells the fascinating story of the Dale case, placing it in the context of legal principles and precedents, Scouts' policies, gay rights, and the "culture wars" in American politics.

The story begins with James Dale, a nineteen-year old Eagle Scout and assistant scoutmaster in New Jersey, who came out as a gay man in the summer of 1990. The Boy Scouts, citing their policy that denied membership to "avowed homosexuals," promptly terminated Dale's membership. Homosexuality, the Boy Scout leadership insisted, violated the Scouts' pledge to be "morally straight." With the aid of the Lambda Legal Defense Fund, Dale sued for discrimination.

Ellis tracks the case from its initial filing in New Jersey through the final decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in favor of the Scouts. In addition to examining the legal issues at stake, including the effect of the Supreme Court's ruling on the law of free association, Ellis also describes Dale's personal journey and its intersection with an evolving gay rights movement. Throughout he seeks to understand the puzzle of why the Boy Scouts would adopt and adhere to a policy that jeopardized the organization's iconic place in American culture—and, finally, explores how legal challenges and cultural changes contributed to the Scouts' historic policy reversal in May 2013 that ended the organization's ban on gay youth (though not gay adults).

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

As Americans, we cherish the freedom to associate. However, with the freedom to associate comes the right to exclude those who do not share our values and goals. What happens when the freedom of association collides with the equally cherished principle that every individual should be free from invidious discrimination? This is precisely the question posed in Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale, a lawsuit that made its way through the courts over the course of a decade, culminating in 2000 with a landmark ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Judging the Boy Scouts of America, Richard J. Ellis tells the fascinating story of the Dale case, placing it in the context of legal principles and precedents, Scouts' policies, gay rights, and the "culture wars" in American politics.

The story begins with James Dale, a nineteen-year old Eagle Scout and assistant scoutmaster in New Jersey, who came out as a gay man in the summer of 1990. The Boy Scouts, citing their policy that denied membership to "avowed homosexuals," promptly terminated Dale's membership. Homosexuality, the Boy Scout leadership insisted, violated the Scouts' pledge to be "morally straight." With the aid of the Lambda Legal Defense Fund, Dale sued for discrimination.

Ellis tracks the case from its initial filing in New Jersey through the final decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in favor of the Scouts. In addition to examining the legal issues at stake, including the effect of the Supreme Court's ruling on the law of free association, Ellis also describes Dale's personal journey and its intersection with an evolving gay rights movement. Throughout he seeks to understand the puzzle of why the Boy Scouts would adopt and adhere to a policy that jeopardized the organization's iconic place in American culture—and, finally, explores how legal challenges and cultural changes contributed to the Scouts' historic policy reversal in May 2013 that ended the organization's ban on gay youth (though not gay adults).

More books from University Press of Kansas

Cover of the book Friended at the Front by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book Robert H. Michel by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book President Obama by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book Hoover's FBI and the Fourth Estate by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book American Organic by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book Broken Trust by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book The One-Party Presidential Contest by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book Abandoning Vietnam by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book Rutgers v. Waddington by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book The Big Red One by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book Vietnam's High Ground by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book Irreparable Harm by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book Shiloh by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book Red, White, and Blue by Richard J. Ellis
Cover of the book Presidential Leadership in Political Time by Richard J. Ellis
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy