King and People in Provincial Massachusetts

Nonfiction, History, Americas, United States, Colonial Period (1600-1775)
Cover of the book King and People in Provincial Massachusetts by Richard L. Bushman, Omohundro Institute and University of North Carolina Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Richard L. Bushman ISBN: 9781469600109
Publisher: Omohundro Institute and University of North Carolina Press Publication: June 1, 2013
Imprint: Omohundro Institute and University of North Carolina Press Language: English
Author: Richard L. Bushman
ISBN: 9781469600109
Publisher: Omohundro Institute and University of North Carolina Press
Publication: June 1, 2013
Imprint: Omohundro Institute and University of North Carolina Press
Language: English

The American revolutionaries themselves believed the change from monarchy to republic was the essence of the Revolution. King and People in Provincial Massachusetts explores what monarchy meant to Massachusetts under its second charter and why the momentous change to republican government came about.

Richard L. Bushman argues that monarchy entailed more than having a king as head of state: it was an elaborate political culture with implications for social organization as well. Massachusetts, moreover, was entirely loyal to the king and thoroughly imbued with that culture.

Why then did the colonies become republican in 1776? The change cannot be attributed to a single thinker such as John Locke or to a strain of political thought such as English country party rhetoric. Instead, it was the result of tensions ingrained in the colonial political system that surfaced with the invasion of parliamentary power into colonial affairs after 1763.

The underlying weakness of monarchical government in Massachusetts was the absence of monarchical society -- the intricate web of patronage and dependence that existed in England. But the conflict came from the colonists' conception of rulers as an alien class of exploiters whose interest was the plundering of the colonies. In large part, colonial politics was the effort to restrain official avarice.

The author explicates the meaning of "interest" in political discourse to show how that conception was central in the thinking of both the popular party and the British ministry. Management of the interest of royal officials was a problem that continually bedeviled both the colonists and the crown. Conflict was perennial because the colonists and the ministry pursued diverging objectives in regulating colonial officialdom. Ultimately the colonists came to see that safety against exploitation by self-interested rulers would be assured only by republican government.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The American revolutionaries themselves believed the change from monarchy to republic was the essence of the Revolution. King and People in Provincial Massachusetts explores what monarchy meant to Massachusetts under its second charter and why the momentous change to republican government came about.

Richard L. Bushman argues that monarchy entailed more than having a king as head of state: it was an elaborate political culture with implications for social organization as well. Massachusetts, moreover, was entirely loyal to the king and thoroughly imbued with that culture.

Why then did the colonies become republican in 1776? The change cannot be attributed to a single thinker such as John Locke or to a strain of political thought such as English country party rhetoric. Instead, it was the result of tensions ingrained in the colonial political system that surfaced with the invasion of parliamentary power into colonial affairs after 1763.

The underlying weakness of monarchical government in Massachusetts was the absence of monarchical society -- the intricate web of patronage and dependence that existed in England. But the conflict came from the colonists' conception of rulers as an alien class of exploiters whose interest was the plundering of the colonies. In large part, colonial politics was the effort to restrain official avarice.

The author explicates the meaning of "interest" in political discourse to show how that conception was central in the thinking of both the popular party and the British ministry. Management of the interest of royal officials was a problem that continually bedeviled both the colonists and the crown. Conflict was perennial because the colonists and the ministry pursued diverging objectives in regulating colonial officialdom. Ultimately the colonists came to see that safety against exploitation by self-interested rulers would be assured only by republican government.

More books from Omohundro Institute and University of North Carolina Press

Cover of the book The Economy of British America, 1607-1789 by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book Eloquence Is Power by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book The Campaign for the Sugar Islands, 1759 by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book A People's Army by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book Final Passages by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book The Otis Family in Provincial and Revolutionary Massachusetts by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book Columbia Rising by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book Winthrop's Boston by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book Seeds of Extinction by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book John Witherspoon's American Revolution by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book Revolutionary Conceptions by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book Learning to Stand and Speak by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book Sensibility and the American Revolution by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book New Jersey's Jeffersonian Republicans by Richard L. Bushman
Cover of the book Contact Points by Richard L. Bushman
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy