Natural Death in Baudrillard

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Sociology
Cover of the book Natural Death in Baudrillard by Johannes Lenhard, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Johannes Lenhard ISBN: 9783656184478
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: May 7, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Johannes Lenhard
ISBN: 9783656184478
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: May 7, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Sociology - Classics and Theoretical Directions, grade: 2:1, London School of Economics, language: English, abstract: According to Baudrillard, the contemporary 'value system' is based on binary oppositions. The most vital of those are good and evil, man and machine and crucially important life and death. In our society, death is increasingly separated from life in stark contrast to what is still to be found in the 'primitive cultures'. Without being able to explain the alternative system - symbolic exchange - in its complexity, it is important to note its contrasting idea of 'a circular form, a circuit, reversibility' (Baudrillard, 2003: 16ff). In a symbolic system associated but not limited to 'primitives', death is not negativity, not endpoint but rather charged with symbolic meaning as part of a constant exchange procedure, always part of life. For us, death is 'abnormal' and we are constantly striving to extinguish it, make it 'extraterritorial' (Baudrillard, 1993: 126, 182) (e.g. in hospitals, out-of-town cemeteries, palliative clinics). In the following paragraphs, the essay will suggest a reading of Baudrillard's contrasting notion of 'natural death' that he claims to be 'everyone's right and duty'. In the first part, we give a close reading of Baudrillard's notion of natural death - without a primarily critical reflection. What will be suggested is that progress creates both the possibility for a natural, i.e. designed, death and its imperative. The critical reflection of part two will try to qualify Baudrillard's statements with a general critique of his ironic style and advance arguments with regards to content: How is it possible to close of individuality? Is it really a right for 'everyone'? Before this critical account can be appreciated, however, the notion of 'natural death' shall be explained in the following.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Sociology - Classics and Theoretical Directions, grade: 2:1, London School of Economics, language: English, abstract: According to Baudrillard, the contemporary 'value system' is based on binary oppositions. The most vital of those are good and evil, man and machine and crucially important life and death. In our society, death is increasingly separated from life in stark contrast to what is still to be found in the 'primitive cultures'. Without being able to explain the alternative system - symbolic exchange - in its complexity, it is important to note its contrasting idea of 'a circular form, a circuit, reversibility' (Baudrillard, 2003: 16ff). In a symbolic system associated but not limited to 'primitives', death is not negativity, not endpoint but rather charged with symbolic meaning as part of a constant exchange procedure, always part of life. For us, death is 'abnormal' and we are constantly striving to extinguish it, make it 'extraterritorial' (Baudrillard, 1993: 126, 182) (e.g. in hospitals, out-of-town cemeteries, palliative clinics). In the following paragraphs, the essay will suggest a reading of Baudrillard's contrasting notion of 'natural death' that he claims to be 'everyone's right and duty'. In the first part, we give a close reading of Baudrillard's notion of natural death - without a primarily critical reflection. What will be suggested is that progress creates both the possibility for a natural, i.e. designed, death and its imperative. The critical reflection of part two will try to qualify Baudrillard's statements with a general critique of his ironic style and advance arguments with regards to content: How is it possible to close of individuality? Is it really a right for 'everyone'? Before this critical account can be appreciated, however, the notion of 'natural death' shall be explained in the following.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Death and the End of Time in Beckett's Endgame and Ionesco's Exit the King by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Siedlungsstruktur und Infrastrukturkosten by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Ambiguity Handling: Human vs. Machine by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Gender Relations in Frances Burney's 'Evelina'. The Emergence of 'Modern' Standards of Masculinity and Femininity by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Semiotics and Shock Advertisement by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Die pretiale Lenkung von Finanzmitteln im Konzern by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book The Effectiveness of Habitual Residence as a Connecting Factor in the Conflict of Laws by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book The history of Spitalfields by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Noetic Quantic Global Management by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Legal Harmonization. A case study on modelling the legislative processes of the European Union. by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Aspects of Good and Evil in 'Harry Potter - The Prisoner of Azkaban' by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book The Kurile Island Conflict by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Assessing Germany´s National Action Plan on Employment by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Call Me Ishmael - A Critical Analysis of the Narrator in Moby Dick by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book An Analysis of Post 9/11 Presidential Rhetoric - Lead-up to the Iraq War by Johannes Lenhard
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy