Plato's Logic

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Logic, Ancient
Cover of the book Plato's Logic by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi, Hamilton Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi ISBN: 9780761870906
Publisher: Hamilton Books Publication: March 22, 2019
Imprint: Hamilton Books Language: English
Author: Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
ISBN: 9780761870906
Publisher: Hamilton Books
Publication: March 22, 2019
Imprint: Hamilton Books
Language: English

Plato uses a logic without defining or naming it, somewhat as verbs are used in daily life without saying “verbs” or defining them. Linguists may define them. Similarly, Plato’s Logic identifies Plato’s logic: Plato does not. He lives by it.

The logic in question is used to track down first causes. These begin or end causal series of all four of Aristotle’s types of cause. Thus for instance God in the Laws is the first mover in a chain of movers, so God is the first efficient cause. The Republic’s Form of the Good, again, is the highest authority or order, and due to this it is the first formal cause. The Symposium’s Form of Beauty is the first final cause, that is the ultimate reward. The Phaedo’s psyche is a first material cause, being simple (and therefore immortal).

This is not a logic in Aristotle’s sense, but luckily that is not the only sense there is. Plato’s logic is relational, not Aristotelian. This is because the causes are easiest to interpret as causal relations. Then the causal relations form series, and the series begin or end in Forms or Gods. In this book’s formal vocabulary Plato’s logic is always of the form aRbRc… zRz (if the terminus is a God) or aRbRc… zRR (if the terminus is a Form).

All of Plato’s writing is not quite like this, that is true. But his wildest and most characteristic writings are. He does admittedly write many other things as well. But the core of his philosophy consists of his hyperbolical claims about the Forms and Gods, and so they deserve to be in the limelight.

The general idea of this book is that Plato’s idealistic demands make sense in relational idioms. The idealism is not nonsensical or fallacious but rational. Speculation is a duty, not a joke or a sin. Numerous recent scholars are attacked because they belittle it.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Plato uses a logic without defining or naming it, somewhat as verbs are used in daily life without saying “verbs” or defining them. Linguists may define them. Similarly, Plato’s Logic identifies Plato’s logic: Plato does not. He lives by it.

The logic in question is used to track down first causes. These begin or end causal series of all four of Aristotle’s types of cause. Thus for instance God in the Laws is the first mover in a chain of movers, so God is the first efficient cause. The Republic’s Form of the Good, again, is the highest authority or order, and due to this it is the first formal cause. The Symposium’s Form of Beauty is the first final cause, that is the ultimate reward. The Phaedo’s psyche is a first material cause, being simple (and therefore immortal).

This is not a logic in Aristotle’s sense, but luckily that is not the only sense there is. Plato’s logic is relational, not Aristotelian. This is because the causes are easiest to interpret as causal relations. Then the causal relations form series, and the series begin or end in Forms or Gods. In this book’s formal vocabulary Plato’s logic is always of the form aRbRc… zRz (if the terminus is a God) or aRbRc… zRR (if the terminus is a Form).

All of Plato’s writing is not quite like this, that is true. But his wildest and most characteristic writings are. He does admittedly write many other things as well. But the core of his philosophy consists of his hyperbolical claims about the Forms and Gods, and so they deserve to be in the limelight.

The general idea of this book is that Plato’s idealistic demands make sense in relational idioms. The idealism is not nonsensical or fallacious but rational. Speculation is a duty, not a joke or a sin. Numerous recent scholars are attacked because they belittle it.

More books from Hamilton Books

Cover of the book The Wild Longing of the Human Heart by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book Divine Wisdom and Warning by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book Scottish Migration Since 1750 by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book Crossing Stars by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book Emotional Regulation by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book The Incidental Oriental Secretary and Other Tales of Foreign Service by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book 'Is It Global War on Terrorism' or Global War over Terra Africana? by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book Black Rights in the Reconstruction Era by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book Value Creation and Opportunity Management in Africa's Leather Sector by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book Life's Bulldozer Moments by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book Rain on a Strange Roof by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book Lurps by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book My Story by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book Principles of Psychology in Religious Context by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
Cover of the book Timelines into the Future by Tommi Juhani Hanhijärvi
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy