Rationality and Cultural Interpretivism

A Critical Assessment of Failed Solutions

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Epistemology
Cover of the book Rationality and Cultural Interpretivism by Kei Yoshida, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Kei Yoshida ISBN: 9780739174005
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: August 6, 2014
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Kei Yoshida
ISBN: 9780739174005
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: August 6, 2014
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

Rationality and Cultural Interpretivism: A Critical Assessment of Failed Solutions critically assesses cultural interpretivism by scrutinizing five different proponents of it and their solutions to the problem of rationality. The book examines the works of Peter Winch, Charles Taylor, Clifford Geertz, Marshall Sahlins, and Gananath Obeyesekere and their contributions to the so-called rationality debate in the philosophy of the social sciences. This debate began with Winch’s criticism of Edward Evans-Pritchard and has become one of the central debates in the field since 1960s, continuing as a controversy between Sahlins and Obeyesekere.

Kei Yoshida reveals the need for a cogent solution to the problem of rationality. He identifies two main problems with previous theories: first, that they exaggerate the differences between the natural and the social/cultural, and hence they also exaggerate the differences between the natural and the social sciences; and second, that they ignore important social science problems, particularly outcomes from the unintended consequences of human actions. Yoshida urges social scientists not simply to interpret agents’ intentions or symbolic systems, but also to explain the unintended consequences of human actions.

Still entangled in positivism, cultural interpretivists claim that the social sciences differ from the natural sciences and thus reject any unity of method. Yoshida argues that we need to overcome the mistaken positivist image of science in order to develop a more fruitful philosophy of the social sciences. The analysis presented in this book will be of value to students and scholars of social epistemology, philosophy of science, philosophy of the social sciences, and the social sciences themselves, as well as anyone interested in the philosophical problem of rationality and relativism.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Rationality and Cultural Interpretivism: A Critical Assessment of Failed Solutions critically assesses cultural interpretivism by scrutinizing five different proponents of it and their solutions to the problem of rationality. The book examines the works of Peter Winch, Charles Taylor, Clifford Geertz, Marshall Sahlins, and Gananath Obeyesekere and their contributions to the so-called rationality debate in the philosophy of the social sciences. This debate began with Winch’s criticism of Edward Evans-Pritchard and has become one of the central debates in the field since 1960s, continuing as a controversy between Sahlins and Obeyesekere.

Kei Yoshida reveals the need for a cogent solution to the problem of rationality. He identifies two main problems with previous theories: first, that they exaggerate the differences between the natural and the social/cultural, and hence they also exaggerate the differences between the natural and the social sciences; and second, that they ignore important social science problems, particularly outcomes from the unintended consequences of human actions. Yoshida urges social scientists not simply to interpret agents’ intentions or symbolic systems, but also to explain the unintended consequences of human actions.

Still entangled in positivism, cultural interpretivists claim that the social sciences differ from the natural sciences and thus reject any unity of method. Yoshida argues that we need to overcome the mistaken positivist image of science in order to develop a more fruitful philosophy of the social sciences. The analysis presented in this book will be of value to students and scholars of social epistemology, philosophy of science, philosophy of the social sciences, and the social sciences themselves, as well as anyone interested in the philosophical problem of rationality and relativism.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Adam and Eve in Scripture, Theology, and Literature by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book Contemporary Issues in Victimology by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book Black Christology and the Quest for Authenticity by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book Gabriel García Márquez in Retrospect by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book Picturing Thoreau by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book Participation, Community, and Public Policy in a Virginia Suburb by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book The Intertwining of Aesthetics and Ethics by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-First Century by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book Eurasia's Shifting Geopolitical Tectonic Plates by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book Gender and Peacebuilding by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book Transgression as a Mode of Resistance by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book The Vietnam War Debate by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book Government at Work by Kei Yoshida
Cover of the book Portuguese Literature and the Environment by Kei Yoshida
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy