Self-Reflection for the Opaque Mind

An Essay in Neo-Sellarsian Philosophy

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Epistemology, Mind & Body
Cover of the book Self-Reflection for the Opaque Mind by T. Parent, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: T. Parent ISBN: 9781317210955
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: December 1, 2016
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: T. Parent
ISBN: 9781317210955
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: December 1, 2016
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

This volume attempts to solve a grave problem about critical self-reflection. The worry is that we critical thinkers are all in "epistemic bad faith" in light of what psychology tells us. After all, the research shows not merely that we are bad at detecting "ego-threatening" thoughts à la Freud. It also indicates that we are ignorant of even our ordinary thoughts—e.g., reasons for our moral judgments of others (Haidt 2001), and even mundane reasons for buying one pair of stockings over another! (Nisbett & Wilson 1977) However, reflection on one’s thoughts requires knowing what those thoughts are in the first place. So if ignorance is the norm, why attempt self-reflection? The activity would just display naivety about psychology. Yet while respecting all the data, this book argues that, remarkably, we are sometimes infallible in our self-discerning judgments. Even so, infallibility does not imply indubitability, and there is no Cartesian ambition to provide a "foundation" for empirical knowledge. The point is rather to explain how self-reflection as a rational activity is possible.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This volume attempts to solve a grave problem about critical self-reflection. The worry is that we critical thinkers are all in "epistemic bad faith" in light of what psychology tells us. After all, the research shows not merely that we are bad at detecting "ego-threatening" thoughts à la Freud. It also indicates that we are ignorant of even our ordinary thoughts—e.g., reasons for our moral judgments of others (Haidt 2001), and even mundane reasons for buying one pair of stockings over another! (Nisbett & Wilson 1977) However, reflection on one’s thoughts requires knowing what those thoughts are in the first place. So if ignorance is the norm, why attempt self-reflection? The activity would just display naivety about psychology. Yet while respecting all the data, this book argues that, remarkably, we are sometimes infallible in our self-discerning judgments. Even so, infallibility does not imply indubitability, and there is no Cartesian ambition to provide a "foundation" for empirical knowledge. The point is rather to explain how self-reflection as a rational activity is possible.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book The Age of Melancholy by T. Parent
Cover of the book Gadamer and Law by T. Parent
Cover of the book American Artists On Art by T. Parent
Cover of the book The Governance of Sustainable Rural Renewal by T. Parent
Cover of the book Charles Dickens and the Victorian Child by T. Parent
Cover of the book Benjamin for Architects by T. Parent
Cover of the book Aquaculture Development In Less Developed Countries by T. Parent
Cover of the book Observation, Assessment and Planning in Inclusive Autism Education by T. Parent
Cover of the book Public Policy and Media Organizations by T. Parent
Cover of the book Exploring the Boundaries of International Criminal Justice by T. Parent
Cover of the book Integral Logistics Management by T. Parent
Cover of the book Talleyrand by T. Parent
Cover of the book Mapping Worlds by T. Parent
Cover of the book Sūtras, Stories and Yoga Philosophy by T. Parent
Cover of the book The Old Grammar Schools by T. Parent
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy