Self-Reflection for the Opaque Mind

An Essay in Neo-Sellarsian Philosophy

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Epistemology, Mind & Body
Cover of the book Self-Reflection for the Opaque Mind by T. Parent, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: T. Parent ISBN: 9781317210955
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: December 1, 2016
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: T. Parent
ISBN: 9781317210955
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: December 1, 2016
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

This volume attempts to solve a grave problem about critical self-reflection. The worry is that we critical thinkers are all in "epistemic bad faith" in light of what psychology tells us. After all, the research shows not merely that we are bad at detecting "ego-threatening" thoughts à la Freud. It also indicates that we are ignorant of even our ordinary thoughts—e.g., reasons for our moral judgments of others (Haidt 2001), and even mundane reasons for buying one pair of stockings over another! (Nisbett & Wilson 1977) However, reflection on one’s thoughts requires knowing what those thoughts are in the first place. So if ignorance is the norm, why attempt self-reflection? The activity would just display naivety about psychology. Yet while respecting all the data, this book argues that, remarkably, we are sometimes infallible in our self-discerning judgments. Even so, infallibility does not imply indubitability, and there is no Cartesian ambition to provide a "foundation" for empirical knowledge. The point is rather to explain how self-reflection as a rational activity is possible.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This volume attempts to solve a grave problem about critical self-reflection. The worry is that we critical thinkers are all in "epistemic bad faith" in light of what psychology tells us. After all, the research shows not merely that we are bad at detecting "ego-threatening" thoughts à la Freud. It also indicates that we are ignorant of even our ordinary thoughts—e.g., reasons for our moral judgments of others (Haidt 2001), and even mundane reasons for buying one pair of stockings over another! (Nisbett & Wilson 1977) However, reflection on one’s thoughts requires knowing what those thoughts are in the first place. So if ignorance is the norm, why attempt self-reflection? The activity would just display naivety about psychology. Yet while respecting all the data, this book argues that, remarkably, we are sometimes infallible in our self-discerning judgments. Even so, infallibility does not imply indubitability, and there is no Cartesian ambition to provide a "foundation" for empirical knowledge. The point is rather to explain how self-reflection as a rational activity is possible.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Wittgenstein's Intentions (Routledge Revivals) by T. Parent
Cover of the book Coaching Women to Lead by T. Parent
Cover of the book A Theory of Urbanity by T. Parent
Cover of the book The Northern Wars by T. Parent
Cover of the book Between Sacrifice and Desire by T. Parent
Cover of the book Organisation and Administration for Business (RLE: Organizations) by T. Parent
Cover of the book New Dimensions of Politics in India by T. Parent
Cover of the book Campus Violence by T. Parent
Cover of the book The Management of Maritime Regulations by T. Parent
Cover of the book A Sustainable Future for the Mediterranean by T. Parent
Cover of the book What White Looks Like by T. Parent
Cover of the book Euro-Mediterranean Security: A Search for Partnership by T. Parent
Cover of the book In Good Faith by T. Parent
Cover of the book Youth Entrepreneurship and Local Development in Central and Eastern Europe by T. Parent
Cover of the book The Interest Group Society by T. Parent
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy