Sudan - An Analysis of the British Colonial Policy and its Legacy

An Analysis of the British Colonial Policy and its Legacy

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Relations
Cover of the book Sudan - An Analysis of the British Colonial Policy and its Legacy by Sophie Duhnkrack, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Sophie Duhnkrack ISBN: 9783640509218
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: January 13, 2010
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Sophie Duhnkrack
ISBN: 9783640509218
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: January 13, 2010
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Thesis (M.A.) from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: Near East, Near Orient, grade: 90, Ben Gurion University, course: European Colonialism in the Middle East, language: English, abstract: In 1900 Bernard Shaw completed the difficult task of drafting the Fabian's society position in the manifest Fabianism and the Empire. The society's progressive program advocated for socialist values, social justice and women rights. Against the background of these modern and leftist values though, the society's position on imperialism is somehow astonishing. One of the motives for its supportive stand on imperialism lies in the yet valid division they made between domestic and international politics. Edward Pease's The History of the Fabian society addresses the international system, for example under terms of efficiency and colonialism. According to him 'the only valid moral right to national ... possession is that the occupier is making adequate use of it for the benefit of the world community.' From the 'International Socialist point of view' national sovereignty and noninterference are not acceptable and the world must strive for an 'international civilization' according to socialist merits. Pease as well as Bernard Shaw in Fabianism and the Empire accept colonialism as a fact and furthermore they illustrate the Great Powers' advance as colonizers 'only [as] a question of time.' Their exclusive focus was the benefit of the British Empire without a minimal consideration of the dignity or the right to self-determination of the people the British were occupying and exploiting. 'As for parliamentary institutions for native races, that dream has been disposed of ... [t]hey are as useless to them as a dynamo to a Caribbean.' Following this theoretical background, the ensuing paper will focus on the British colonial policy in Sudan. Edward Shaw points out two possible 'imperial policies' of which the second is 'a bureaucratic policy where the majority consists of colored natives.' This illustrates one of the policies the British attempted to implement in Sudan after their conquest of 1899. This paper will analyze various approaches of the British administrative in Sudan, as Indirect Rule and Native Administration. Beyond it, it will address the policy's aims and actual results with which the Sudanese had to cope and which still interfere greatly in the daily reality of Sudan. It will try to draw connection between the actual situation in Sudan, and especially in Darfur, and the colonial legacy of the British policies.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Thesis (M.A.) from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: Near East, Near Orient, grade: 90, Ben Gurion University, course: European Colonialism in the Middle East, language: English, abstract: In 1900 Bernard Shaw completed the difficult task of drafting the Fabian's society position in the manifest Fabianism and the Empire. The society's progressive program advocated for socialist values, social justice and women rights. Against the background of these modern and leftist values though, the society's position on imperialism is somehow astonishing. One of the motives for its supportive stand on imperialism lies in the yet valid division they made between domestic and international politics. Edward Pease's The History of the Fabian society addresses the international system, for example under terms of efficiency and colonialism. According to him 'the only valid moral right to national ... possession is that the occupier is making adequate use of it for the benefit of the world community.' From the 'International Socialist point of view' national sovereignty and noninterference are not acceptable and the world must strive for an 'international civilization' according to socialist merits. Pease as well as Bernard Shaw in Fabianism and the Empire accept colonialism as a fact and furthermore they illustrate the Great Powers' advance as colonizers 'only [as] a question of time.' Their exclusive focus was the benefit of the British Empire without a minimal consideration of the dignity or the right to self-determination of the people the British were occupying and exploiting. 'As for parliamentary institutions for native races, that dream has been disposed of ... [t]hey are as useless to them as a dynamo to a Caribbean.' Following this theoretical background, the ensuing paper will focus on the British colonial policy in Sudan. Edward Shaw points out two possible 'imperial policies' of which the second is 'a bureaucratic policy where the majority consists of colored natives.' This illustrates one of the policies the British attempted to implement in Sudan after their conquest of 1899. This paper will analyze various approaches of the British administrative in Sudan, as Indirect Rule and Native Administration. Beyond it, it will address the policy's aims and actual results with which the Sudanese had to cope and which still interfere greatly in the daily reality of Sudan. It will try to draw connection between the actual situation in Sudan, and especially in Darfur, and the colonial legacy of the British policies.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Canadian-American relations by the example of the characters in David French's 'Jitters' by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book Similar Solutions to Similar Problems? by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book Socio-Economic Impacts of Beijing 2008 by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book The performance of the artist Marina Abramovi? in the MoMA - Museum of Modern Art, N.Y. as a mirror of zeitgeist by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book 'Making a change?!' - Between Grassroots and Commercialisation in Contemporary American Rap Music by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book How American is German Politics? by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book Liberalism, Fascism, and Their Different Conceptions of Rights by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book The European Convention on Human Rights and its Case Law in Relation to the Deportation of Aliens by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book Beautiful landscape, drinking and fighting. Stereotypes of the Irish abroad by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book The Dilemma of Cash Management in China by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book 'The spectator and not the actor is the central focus of Brecht's stagecraft' by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book Revisiting the 10-year old Philippine Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001 (R.A. 9136) and Its Local Implications by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book Rechte der Aktionäre am Beispiel der Entscheidungen Holzmüller, Macrotron, Gelatine by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book Approaching the British Heavies and Tabloids by Comparing two Chosen Articles by Sophie Duhnkrack
Cover of the book Social Entrepreneurship by Sophie Duhnkrack
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy