The Foetus and The European Court of Human Rights. To what extent has the European Court of Human Rights adopted a pro-life approach in its jurisprudence on abortion?

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, International
Cover of the book The Foetus and The European Court of Human Rights. To what extent has the European Court of Human Rights adopted a pro-life approach in its jurisprudence on abortion? by Reece Wilkes, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Reece Wilkes ISBN: 9783668615915
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: January 18, 2018
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Reece Wilkes
ISBN: 9783668615915
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: January 18, 2018
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Master's Thesis from the year 2017 in the subject Law - European and International Law, Intellectual Properties, grade: Merit, , course: International Law, language: English, abstract: The issue of abortion has always remained a taboo, not only socially but many legal systems have different attitudes towards it. With the creation of the European Convention on Human Rights and a Court of last resort to deal with alleged breaches by the State came the expectation that it had to deal with this pertinent issue due to States refusing to legalise abortion or limiting access to it. This paper considers the extent to which the Courts jurisprudence has adopted a pro-life approach and if so, why. The paper reveals that there are competing interests, namely between three parties: The foetus, the woman and the State and that the Court has had to balance its judgements carefully, depending on the circumstances of each case, without intruding on a woman's right to privacy under Art 8. It concludes that the Court has tried to stay as neutral as possible when dealing with cases on abortion, presumably understanding the contentions that would be raised if it is overly eager to appease one party over the other. This necessitates a new legal theory which is necessary due to the competing interests of each party over the other. Contained within the paper, a new legal theory named 'The Triad of Rights' is created which shows how women's rights, foetal rights and State rights are unable to be dissociated from each other on the issue of abortion, indicating why the Court tries to stay as neutral as possible.

Legal interests: * Slander; libel; defamation cases * Human rights * Rule of law * Tort law * Criminal law * Vicarious liability

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Master's Thesis from the year 2017 in the subject Law - European and International Law, Intellectual Properties, grade: Merit, , course: International Law, language: English, abstract: The issue of abortion has always remained a taboo, not only socially but many legal systems have different attitudes towards it. With the creation of the European Convention on Human Rights and a Court of last resort to deal with alleged breaches by the State came the expectation that it had to deal with this pertinent issue due to States refusing to legalise abortion or limiting access to it. This paper considers the extent to which the Courts jurisprudence has adopted a pro-life approach and if so, why. The paper reveals that there are competing interests, namely between three parties: The foetus, the woman and the State and that the Court has had to balance its judgements carefully, depending on the circumstances of each case, without intruding on a woman's right to privacy under Art 8. It concludes that the Court has tried to stay as neutral as possible when dealing with cases on abortion, presumably understanding the contentions that would be raised if it is overly eager to appease one party over the other. This necessitates a new legal theory which is necessary due to the competing interests of each party over the other. Contained within the paper, a new legal theory named 'The Triad of Rights' is created which shows how women's rights, foetal rights and State rights are unable to be dissociated from each other on the issue of abortion, indicating why the Court tries to stay as neutral as possible.

Legal interests: * Slander; libel; defamation cases * Human rights * Rule of law * Tort law * Criminal law * Vicarious liability

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Tylophora indica: Phytochemical, Biotechnological and Pharmacological Approach by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book Die Beziehungen der Europäischen Union zum Staate Israel by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book Die Disidentität der Formen - Wie Mondrian eine Bedeutung erzeugt by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book Die Bestimmung des angemessenen Abzinsungssatzes bei der Ermittlung eines Value in Use nach IAS 36 by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book Der Antisemitismus der Zweiten Republik Polens 1918-1939 by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book Probleme der Sicherungsabtretung in Österreich by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book AVATARE in Online-Spielen - Probleme und Chancen by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book Unterrichtsstunde: Die Zelle, Grundbaustein des Lebens by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book Was ist Glück? Unterrichtsentwurf für eine 9. Klasse by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book Förderfaktoren von Transfererfolg in der betrieblichen Weiterbildung by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book Die Gleichnisse Jesu - Formen, Bedeutung und Auslegungsmethoden by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book Globalisierung: Das Ende der Politik? by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book Die Frage nach der rechtmäßigen Nachfolge des Propheten - Theologie und Bedeutung der Charigiten im 7. und 8. Jahrhundert by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book Post Merger Integration. Erfolgsfaktoren bei Unternehmenszusammenschlüssen der produzierenden Industrie: Anlagen- und Maschinenbau by Reece Wilkes
Cover of the book AJAX Grundlagen und Verwendung in .NET - Stichwort 'ATLAS' by Reece Wilkes
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy