The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Jurisprudence, International
Cover of the book The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice by Gerard Conway, Cambridge University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Gerard Conway ISBN: 9781139209533
Publisher: Cambridge University Press Publication: January 12, 2012
Imprint: Cambridge University Press Language: English
Author: Gerard Conway
ISBN: 9781139209533
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication: January 12, 2012
Imprint: Cambridge University Press
Language: English

The European Court of Justice is widely acknowledged to have played a fundamental role in developing the constitutional law of the EU, having been the first to establish such key doctrines as direct effect, supremacy and parallelism in external relations. Traditionally, EU scholarship has praised the role of the ECJ, with more critical perspectives being given little voice in mainstream EU studies. From the standpoint of legal reasoning, Gerard Conway offers the first sustained critical assessment of how the ECJ engages in its function and offers a new argument as to how it should engage in legal reasoning. He also explains how different approaches to legal reasoning can fundamentally change the outcome of case law and how the constitutional values of the EU justify a different approach to the dominant method of the ECJ.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The European Court of Justice is widely acknowledged to have played a fundamental role in developing the constitutional law of the EU, having been the first to establish such key doctrines as direct effect, supremacy and parallelism in external relations. Traditionally, EU scholarship has praised the role of the ECJ, with more critical perspectives being given little voice in mainstream EU studies. From the standpoint of legal reasoning, Gerard Conway offers the first sustained critical assessment of how the ECJ engages in its function and offers a new argument as to how it should engage in legal reasoning. He also explains how different approaches to legal reasoning can fundamentally change the outcome of case law and how the constitutional values of the EU justify a different approach to the dominant method of the ECJ.

More books from Cambridge University Press

Cover of the book Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book The Iran–Iraq War by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book The Mind on Paper by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Religious Fictionalism by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book The Origins of the First World War by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Grand Strategy and Military Alliances by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Non-homogeneous Random Walks by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Modern Compiler Implementation in C by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Teaching Law by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Magnetic Memory by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book The Shakespearean Forest by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book A History of Archaeological Thought by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Waves and Mean Flows by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Drama Techniques by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Poetry and Paternity in Renaissance England by Gerard Conway
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy