The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Jurisprudence, International
Cover of the book The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice by Gerard Conway, Cambridge University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Gerard Conway ISBN: 9781139209533
Publisher: Cambridge University Press Publication: January 12, 2012
Imprint: Cambridge University Press Language: English
Author: Gerard Conway
ISBN: 9781139209533
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication: January 12, 2012
Imprint: Cambridge University Press
Language: English

The European Court of Justice is widely acknowledged to have played a fundamental role in developing the constitutional law of the EU, having been the first to establish such key doctrines as direct effect, supremacy and parallelism in external relations. Traditionally, EU scholarship has praised the role of the ECJ, with more critical perspectives being given little voice in mainstream EU studies. From the standpoint of legal reasoning, Gerard Conway offers the first sustained critical assessment of how the ECJ engages in its function and offers a new argument as to how it should engage in legal reasoning. He also explains how different approaches to legal reasoning can fundamentally change the outcome of case law and how the constitutional values of the EU justify a different approach to the dominant method of the ECJ.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The European Court of Justice is widely acknowledged to have played a fundamental role in developing the constitutional law of the EU, having been the first to establish such key doctrines as direct effect, supremacy and parallelism in external relations. Traditionally, EU scholarship has praised the role of the ECJ, with more critical perspectives being given little voice in mainstream EU studies. From the standpoint of legal reasoning, Gerard Conway offers the first sustained critical assessment of how the ECJ engages in its function and offers a new argument as to how it should engage in legal reasoning. He also explains how different approaches to legal reasoning can fundamentally change the outcome of case law and how the constitutional values of the EU justify a different approach to the dominant method of the ECJ.

More books from Cambridge University Press

Cover of the book The Content and Context of Hate Speech by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book The Affordable Care Act and Medicare in Comparative Context by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Staying Roman by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Governing Sustainability by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Comparative Corporate Governance of Non-Profit Organizations by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Democracy, Inequality and Corruption by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Mortal and Divine in Early Greek Epistemology by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Can Delaware Be Dethroned? by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book India before Europe by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book China's Troubled Waters by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book The British Army and the First World War by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book Data Analysis and Graphics Using R by Gerard Conway
Cover of the book String Theory: Volume 2, Superstring Theory and Beyond by Gerard Conway
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy