The U.S.' and Israel's Securitization of Iran's Nuclear Energy

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Security
Cover of the book The U.S.' and Israel's Securitization of Iran's Nuclear Energy by Nassef M. Adiong, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Nassef M. Adiong ISBN: 9783640266197
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: February 12, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Nassef M. Adiong
ISBN: 9783640266197
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: February 12, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: A+, Technological University of the Philippines (International Studies), course: for college papers, 21 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Caveat: The title above is quite absurd due to the fact that in the traditional sense of defining security, any country aspiring for weapons of mass destruction or WMDs, which obviously nuclear used for developing weapons, is part and parcel of that nexus and is apparently a security issue; in other words it doesn't need the securitization process. It absolutely manifests the core concepts of traditional security which is akin to military, war, or what we should say high politics of hard power prior to the Cold War period. However, my conception of the above statement is merely a Western thought, though majority in the academia that specializes in international security accept that premise. One would ask if we can actually securitize a security issue. The answer is definitely no, because in the first place, it has been securitized and an extraordinary response was made to normalize the matter. The nuclear energy issue of Iran is a different case because it was foreseen as an unprecedented security matter by Israel and the United States in which Iran hasn't developed a culpable force of nuclear enrichment particularly uranium that would be used for military defence or political weapons as how the West reiterated this contention. The thin difference in securitizing Iran's nuclear energy ambition is looking at a causational link that made Iran decided to produce its own nuclear energy enrichment, which scholars have been debating on the intent and purpose of Iran. [...]

Nassef is a lifelong learner of comparative study between Islam and International Relations. He created the IR-IS Research Cohort on December 2012 that became Co-IRIS (International Relations and Islamic Studies Research Cohort) on November 2013. In addition to his service to profession, he founded the Philippine International Studies Organization (PHISO) on September 2015.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: A+, Technological University of the Philippines (International Studies), course: for college papers, 21 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Caveat: The title above is quite absurd due to the fact that in the traditional sense of defining security, any country aspiring for weapons of mass destruction or WMDs, which obviously nuclear used for developing weapons, is part and parcel of that nexus and is apparently a security issue; in other words it doesn't need the securitization process. It absolutely manifests the core concepts of traditional security which is akin to military, war, or what we should say high politics of hard power prior to the Cold War period. However, my conception of the above statement is merely a Western thought, though majority in the academia that specializes in international security accept that premise. One would ask if we can actually securitize a security issue. The answer is definitely no, because in the first place, it has been securitized and an extraordinary response was made to normalize the matter. The nuclear energy issue of Iran is a different case because it was foreseen as an unprecedented security matter by Israel and the United States in which Iran hasn't developed a culpable force of nuclear enrichment particularly uranium that would be used for military defence or political weapons as how the West reiterated this contention. The thin difference in securitizing Iran's nuclear energy ambition is looking at a causational link that made Iran decided to produce its own nuclear energy enrichment, which scholars have been debating on the intent and purpose of Iran. [...]

Nassef is a lifelong learner of comparative study between Islam and International Relations. He created the IR-IS Research Cohort on December 2012 that became Co-IRIS (International Relations and Islamic Studies Research Cohort) on November 2013. In addition to his service to profession, he founded the Philippine International Studies Organization (PHISO) on September 2015.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book The Legacy of the Civil Rights Movement for the Hispanics by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book On Adjectival Passives in English by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Delivering Quality Of Services For Media Streaming Networks by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Reconciliation in Sri Lanka by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Comparison between Bertolt Brechts 'Der gute Mensch von Sezuan' and Robert Louis Stevensons 'The strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde' by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Teaching Intercultural Communicative Competence with a Textbook by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book When disaster strikes... A guideline to business continuity awareness by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The importance of highland landscape as a metaphor for Scotland in Forsyth's 'Local Hero' by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Matrilineal Puzzle by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The German Influence on Australian and American English by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Iraq against the United States of America: a proposal of a judgment of the International Court of Justice (events of 2003) by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Cockney and Estuary English. A comparison by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Semantic Relations in the Phenomenon of Syllepsis by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book How, if at all, have the mass media reinforced social inequalities? by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book What is Human Recourse Strategy? by Nassef M. Adiong
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy