The U.S.' and Israel's Securitization of Iran's Nuclear Energy

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Security
Cover of the book The U.S.' and Israel's Securitization of Iran's Nuclear Energy by Nassef M. Adiong, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Nassef M. Adiong ISBN: 9783640266197
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: February 12, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Nassef M. Adiong
ISBN: 9783640266197
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: February 12, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: A+, Technological University of the Philippines (International Studies), course: for college papers, 21 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Caveat: The title above is quite absurd due to the fact that in the traditional sense of defining security, any country aspiring for weapons of mass destruction or WMDs, which obviously nuclear used for developing weapons, is part and parcel of that nexus and is apparently a security issue; in other words it doesn't need the securitization process. It absolutely manifests the core concepts of traditional security which is akin to military, war, or what we should say high politics of hard power prior to the Cold War period. However, my conception of the above statement is merely a Western thought, though majority in the academia that specializes in international security accept that premise. One would ask if we can actually securitize a security issue. The answer is definitely no, because in the first place, it has been securitized and an extraordinary response was made to normalize the matter. The nuclear energy issue of Iran is a different case because it was foreseen as an unprecedented security matter by Israel and the United States in which Iran hasn't developed a culpable force of nuclear enrichment particularly uranium that would be used for military defence or political weapons as how the West reiterated this contention. The thin difference in securitizing Iran's nuclear energy ambition is looking at a causational link that made Iran decided to produce its own nuclear energy enrichment, which scholars have been debating on the intent and purpose of Iran. [...]

Nassef is a lifelong learner of comparative study between Islam and International Relations. He created the IR-IS Research Cohort on December 2012 that became Co-IRIS (International Relations and Islamic Studies Research Cohort) on November 2013. In addition to his service to profession, he founded the Philippine International Studies Organization (PHISO) on September 2015.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: A+, Technological University of the Philippines (International Studies), course: for college papers, 21 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Caveat: The title above is quite absurd due to the fact that in the traditional sense of defining security, any country aspiring for weapons of mass destruction or WMDs, which obviously nuclear used for developing weapons, is part and parcel of that nexus and is apparently a security issue; in other words it doesn't need the securitization process. It absolutely manifests the core concepts of traditional security which is akin to military, war, or what we should say high politics of hard power prior to the Cold War period. However, my conception of the above statement is merely a Western thought, though majority in the academia that specializes in international security accept that premise. One would ask if we can actually securitize a security issue. The answer is definitely no, because in the first place, it has been securitized and an extraordinary response was made to normalize the matter. The nuclear energy issue of Iran is a different case because it was foreseen as an unprecedented security matter by Israel and the United States in which Iran hasn't developed a culpable force of nuclear enrichment particularly uranium that would be used for military defence or political weapons as how the West reiterated this contention. The thin difference in securitizing Iran's nuclear energy ambition is looking at a causational link that made Iran decided to produce its own nuclear energy enrichment, which scholars have been debating on the intent and purpose of Iran. [...]

Nassef is a lifelong learner of comparative study between Islam and International Relations. He created the IR-IS Research Cohort on December 2012 that became Co-IRIS (International Relations and Islamic Studies Research Cohort) on November 2013. In addition to his service to profession, he founded the Philippine International Studies Organization (PHISO) on September 2015.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book 'Violent and Sly' - Negative stereotypes of Mexican-American men in the american media by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book American Deathways: The Meaning of Death in the American Indian Society by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Candomblé and the Brazilian jeitinho by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Is English Really a Tool of Integration? by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The German-Jewish Relationship Question In The Light Of Human Cultural Evolution by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Variables in Travelling Abroad by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Regional variation in British English - Focus on Scotland by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Science or Pseudo-Science? by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Does the senate enhance oder undermine australian liberal democracy? by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The construction of gender roles in peer groups by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The Implication of PEDP on School Administration, Teaching and Learning Process in Tanzania - Success and Challenges by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Duty to report in accordance with IFRS 3 by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Critical analysis of the development of institutions which are related and/or are crucial for the implementation of biodiversity treaties by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Elements of Comedy in Luis Valdez's Acto Los Vendidos as Techniques for Communication and Mobilisation by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Development as Freedom by Nassef M. Adiong
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy