Tocqueville and Hartz v. Madison

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, History & Theory
Cover of the book Tocqueville and Hartz v. Madison by Peter Neitzsch, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Peter Neitzsch ISBN: 9783638563321
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: October 31, 2006
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Peter Neitzsch
ISBN: 9783638563321
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: October 31, 2006
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 1,3, Dresden Technical University (Institut für Politikwissenschaft), course: Political Ideas and Political Institutions in the United States, 4 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: This essay discusses the question whether - regarding the United States in the late 18th and 19th centuries - we should consider that political values or political institutions were more responsible for the maintenance of democratic practices. For this purpose the arguments of Madison, Tocqueville and Hartz are reconsidered. Since the fall of Rome there was no long lasting democracy in the history of mankind, though there had been several attempts to establish one, all failed in terms of duration. So the founding fathers of the American Constitution in the late 18th century were deeply concerned about the possible failure of the young democracy. So far all empirical evidence supported Platon's teachings of a cycle of returning political regimes that led inevitably from democracy to oligarchy to dictatorship and again to monarchy. The construction of a political system that was both democratic and stable had never worked before. So the main question of this essay, whether political values or political institutions were more responsible for the maintenance of democratic practices, was essential to the people of that time. The Federalists' most important question is: How can one create a stable political order that is still free and democratic? Their answer is: By carefully constructing the political institutions in a way that compensates the imperfection of man. In contrast to this Tocqueville and, tying up to him, Hartz are pointing out the necessity of political values to maintain democratic practices. In my opinion, institutions are more important than political culture in order to create a stable political system, but surely both factors cannot be isolated from each other. Not only do they strongly depend on each other but can probably even be regarded as two sides of the same coin. To prove this thesis I will first introduce the different approaches of Madison, substitutional for The Federalists, who favour a strong state, and of Tocqueville and Hartz, who rather accentuate the importance of political culture and civic virtues. In my opinion all three authors agree on the relevance of both pillars of democracy - polities and culture. Indeed, I believe that Tocqueville recognises the need for strong institutions just as much as Madison. Furthermore I want to introduce 'economic prosperity' as a third stability granting factor to which in my opinion is paid too little attention by the relevant authors.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 1,3, Dresden Technical University (Institut für Politikwissenschaft), course: Political Ideas and Political Institutions in the United States, 4 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: This essay discusses the question whether - regarding the United States in the late 18th and 19th centuries - we should consider that political values or political institutions were more responsible for the maintenance of democratic practices. For this purpose the arguments of Madison, Tocqueville and Hartz are reconsidered. Since the fall of Rome there was no long lasting democracy in the history of mankind, though there had been several attempts to establish one, all failed in terms of duration. So the founding fathers of the American Constitution in the late 18th century were deeply concerned about the possible failure of the young democracy. So far all empirical evidence supported Platon's teachings of a cycle of returning political regimes that led inevitably from democracy to oligarchy to dictatorship and again to monarchy. The construction of a political system that was both democratic and stable had never worked before. So the main question of this essay, whether political values or political institutions were more responsible for the maintenance of democratic practices, was essential to the people of that time. The Federalists' most important question is: How can one create a stable political order that is still free and democratic? Their answer is: By carefully constructing the political institutions in a way that compensates the imperfection of man. In contrast to this Tocqueville and, tying up to him, Hartz are pointing out the necessity of political values to maintain democratic practices. In my opinion, institutions are more important than political culture in order to create a stable political system, but surely both factors cannot be isolated from each other. Not only do they strongly depend on each other but can probably even be regarded as two sides of the same coin. To prove this thesis I will first introduce the different approaches of Madison, substitutional for The Federalists, who favour a strong state, and of Tocqueville and Hartz, who rather accentuate the importance of political culture and civic virtues. In my opinion all three authors agree on the relevance of both pillars of democracy - polities and culture. Indeed, I believe that Tocqueville recognises the need for strong institutions just as much as Madison. Furthermore I want to introduce 'economic prosperity' as a third stability granting factor to which in my opinion is paid too little attention by the relevant authors.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book The depiction of women in Sandra Cisneros novel 'The House On Mango Street' by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book The current housing/lending crisis in America; the trigger for the following global economic crash/ depression since 2008; an economic analysis of what we should do now by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Aspects of Newspaper Language - newspaper coverage with focus on the example of the Harold Shipman case by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book The National Health Service - an antiquated system of healthcare by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Besteuerung der Europäischen Aktiengesellschaft by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Lord Arthur Goring - Oscar Wilde's Dandy by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book With reference to the sources and relevant secondary literature examine the reasons for the success of the First Crusade. by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book The effect of branding on the development of a company with an example of Puma by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book The Pennsylvania German English - the Language of the Pennsylvania Germans by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Japan's Foreign and Security Policy in the Twenty First Century: Challenges and Alternatives by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book The Enterprise Valuation Theory and Practice by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book 'A Midsummer Night's Dream' and 'The Tempest' in the mirror of changing critical approaches by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book Chicago at the turn of the 20th century by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book The Influence of Institutional Investors on Corporate Management and Corporate Governance in Germany by Peter Neitzsch
Cover of the book The National Organization for Women and the fight for the Equal Rights Amendment by Peter Neitzsch
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy