Llewellyn's law job theory and the challenge of the current ban on prisoners' voting. Should prisoners in the United Kingdom be granted the right to vote?

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Criminal Procedure
Cover of the book Llewellyn's law job theory and the challenge of the current ban on prisoners' voting. Should prisoners in the United Kingdom be granted the right to vote? by M. T., GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: M. T. ISBN: 9783656986164
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: July 28, 2016
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: M. T.
ISBN: 9783656986164
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: July 28, 2016
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Essay from the year 2016 in the subject Law - Criminal process, Criminology, Law Enforcement, grade: 68%, 11 Punkte, , language: English, abstract: The aim of this essay is to work out and comment upon the treatment of prisoner voting rights by different instruments and the respective authorities on the basis of the parliamentary briefing paper dated from 11 February 2015 with particular consideration of the implementation of Llewellyn's law jobs. First, this essay will present Llewellyn's law job theory, then it will outline general provisions relating to voting rights. In the next section, the ECtHR's and the UK government's point of view on this debate will be critically examined, followed by an evaluation referring to the operation of the law jobs, especially emphasizing tensions regarding the resolution of trouble cases and the guiding of people's conduct. Should prisoners in the United Kingdom be granted the right to vote? Several cases - Hirst v The United Kingdom (No 2) probably being the most popular example, where the convicted sought to challenge the current ban on prisoners' voting - raised this issue in the recent years. A highly controversial debate was thereby initiated, especially against the backdrop of frequently arising tensions between the UK and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as to the nature and extent of how some substantive rights operate. Since the Human Rights Act 1998 incorporates the rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into the law of the UK, the national courts are generally obliged to interpret national law in a manner compatible with the ECHR and to consider the decisions of the ECtHR .

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2016 in the subject Law - Criminal process, Criminology, Law Enforcement, grade: 68%, 11 Punkte, , language: English, abstract: The aim of this essay is to work out and comment upon the treatment of prisoner voting rights by different instruments and the respective authorities on the basis of the parliamentary briefing paper dated from 11 February 2015 with particular consideration of the implementation of Llewellyn's law jobs. First, this essay will present Llewellyn's law job theory, then it will outline general provisions relating to voting rights. In the next section, the ECtHR's and the UK government's point of view on this debate will be critically examined, followed by an evaluation referring to the operation of the law jobs, especially emphasizing tensions regarding the resolution of trouble cases and the guiding of people's conduct. Should prisoners in the United Kingdom be granted the right to vote? Several cases - Hirst v The United Kingdom (No 2) probably being the most popular example, where the convicted sought to challenge the current ban on prisoners' voting - raised this issue in the recent years. A highly controversial debate was thereby initiated, especially against the backdrop of frequently arising tensions between the UK and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as to the nature and extent of how some substantive rights operate. Since the Human Rights Act 1998 incorporates the rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into the law of the UK, the national courts are generally obliged to interpret national law in a manner compatible with the ECHR and to consider the decisions of the ECtHR .

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Korrelation, Korrelationskoeffizienten by M. T.
Cover of the book Automatic irrigation control system by M. T.
Cover of the book Der Krieg in Spanien 217/ 211-205 v. Christus by M. T.
Cover of the book Technopolis - Japans Versuch zu Wirtschaftswachstum und Dezentralisierung by M. T.
Cover of the book Die rechtliche Zulässigkeit placebokontrollierter klinischer Prüfungen nach der 12. Novelle des Arzneimittelgesetzes by M. T.
Cover of the book Die Bedeutung von außerschulischen Lernorten im heimatkundlichen Sachunterricht am Beispiel Steinhude früher und heute by M. T.
Cover of the book Telemedizin im modernen Gesundheitsmarkt by M. T.
Cover of the book Brandschutz in Altenheimen und Altenpflegeheimen by M. T.
Cover of the book To what extent do the Brothers Grimm conform to contemporary eighteenth century notions of gender in their tales? by M. T.
Cover of the book Einige Fakten und Ansichten des Terrorismus in ex- Jugoslawien by M. T.
Cover of the book Der geologische Bau der Alpen by M. T.
Cover of the book Der erhabene Tod in Schillers ästhetischer Theorie und seine Exemplifizierung in 'Kabale und Liebe' by M. T.
Cover of the book Ein Vergleich der Rechtskultur Spaniens und Deutschlands am Beispiel des Erblassens by M. T.
Cover of the book Wie nehmen Moose Wasser auf? (Klasse 7, Realschule) by M. T.
Cover of the book Der Fall EADS: Der Airbus by M. T.
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy