On the acquisition of negation: What role does Universal Grammar play in first and second language acquisition?

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Drama, Anthologies
Cover of the book On the acquisition of negation: What role does Universal Grammar play in first and second language acquisition? by Lars Berghaus, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Lars Berghaus ISBN: 9783638686341
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: May 20, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Lars Berghaus
ISBN: 9783638686341
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: May 20, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject American Studies - Linguistics, grade: 2,3, University of Cologne, 14 Literaturquellen entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The ability to learn and produce natural language and move beyond the communication of sign and body language is unique to human beings. The acquisition of language is possible since grammar is assumed to be universal. Universal Grammar (UG) defines properties of language itself. CHOMSKY'S theory of grammar is constrained, first, by universal grammatical principles which determine the broad outline of grammar and are generally true and, second, by grammatical parameters which are language-specific dimensions of a particular language and allow crosslinguistic variation. The first doesn't have to be learned since it is part of the innate language faculty; the latter needs to be acquired and is assumed to be linked to individual items in the lexicon (CAPDEVILA I BATET ET AL. 1995, 31). The central task of acquisition is thus the construction of the grammar of the target language, in other words, the setting of parameters, which is also referred to as grammatical learning (versus lexical learning). One of the parameters that needs to be set is the construction of negation. In this paper, I look at the nature and operation of negation (part I) and how children and adults acquire it during their first and second language acquisition process of different languages (parts II and III). Moreover, underlying principles and mechanisms of L1 and L2 acquisition will be discussed and compared. I want to investigate the way in which the principles and parameters of UG (do not) operate over time as the individual's grammar gradually develops and find out if the children's and adults' grammars conform to these. An individual acquiring L1 has to access the innate grammatical principals of UG in the initial state and learn the language-specific grammatical parameters. L1 acquisition is rapid, uniform and almost error-free. How the acquisition of negation for an L1-learner develops will be presented in the second part. L2-learners have already learned an L1 and are expected to be competent users of the specific grammar of their first language. They learn a second language, i.e. determine a new setting for relevant grammatical parameters in order to arrive at a linguistic system of the target L2. Their acquisition is characterized by great variability crosslinguistically and across individual learners (MEISEL 1997, 227). Part 3 looks at 2LA of negation and wants to describe whether 1LA and 2LA share similarities and if UG plays a role in 2LA.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject American Studies - Linguistics, grade: 2,3, University of Cologne, 14 Literaturquellen entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The ability to learn and produce natural language and move beyond the communication of sign and body language is unique to human beings. The acquisition of language is possible since grammar is assumed to be universal. Universal Grammar (UG) defines properties of language itself. CHOMSKY'S theory of grammar is constrained, first, by universal grammatical principles which determine the broad outline of grammar and are generally true and, second, by grammatical parameters which are language-specific dimensions of a particular language and allow crosslinguistic variation. The first doesn't have to be learned since it is part of the innate language faculty; the latter needs to be acquired and is assumed to be linked to individual items in the lexicon (CAPDEVILA I BATET ET AL. 1995, 31). The central task of acquisition is thus the construction of the grammar of the target language, in other words, the setting of parameters, which is also referred to as grammatical learning (versus lexical learning). One of the parameters that needs to be set is the construction of negation. In this paper, I look at the nature and operation of negation (part I) and how children and adults acquire it during their first and second language acquisition process of different languages (parts II and III). Moreover, underlying principles and mechanisms of L1 and L2 acquisition will be discussed and compared. I want to investigate the way in which the principles and parameters of UG (do not) operate over time as the individual's grammar gradually develops and find out if the children's and adults' grammars conform to these. An individual acquiring L1 has to access the innate grammatical principals of UG in the initial state and learn the language-specific grammatical parameters. L1 acquisition is rapid, uniform and almost error-free. How the acquisition of negation for an L1-learner develops will be presented in the second part. L2-learners have already learned an L1 and are expected to be competent users of the specific grammar of their first language. They learn a second language, i.e. determine a new setting for relevant grammatical parameters in order to arrive at a linguistic system of the target L2. Their acquisition is characterized by great variability crosslinguistically and across individual learners (MEISEL 1997, 227). Part 3 looks at 2LA of negation and wants to describe whether 1LA and 2LA share similarities and if UG plays a role in 2LA.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Mittelalterliche Vorstellungen von Kind und Kindheit by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Data Driven Display Advertising by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Die Beweislastumkehr im Zivilprozess bei Pflege- und Behandlungsfehlern by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Karteninterpretation der topographischen Karte 'L5130 Erfurt W' by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement - eine Ressource für Erwerbsarbeit by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Der Frieden von Apameia by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book The 'Fair Youth' and the 'Dark Lady' in Shakespeare's sonnets and their relationship to the Poetic Persona by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Peter Petersens Jena-Plan by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Liszt's musicianship in his two legends, St. François d'Assise: La predication aux Oiseaux, and St. François de Paule: Marchant sur les flots by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Edmund Husserl, Lebenswelt - Ein Überblick by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Einsetzbarkeit von eLearning-Methoden bei der Einführung neuer Mitarbeiter in Unternehmen by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Die historische Entwicklung des Verhältnisses beruflicher und allgemeiner Bildung. Ausarbeitung zu Texten von P. Sextro und J. H. Pestalozzi by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Biografische Selbstreflexion mit fremduntergebrachten Kindern by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book Die Repgen-Scholder-Kontroverse um die Nazi-Kirchenpolitik by Lars Berghaus
Cover of the book J.R.R. Tolkiens 'The Hobbit' als Beispiel für fantasy literature im Englischunterricht der 10. Jahrgangsstufe by Lars Berghaus
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy