The Concept of Reduction

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Epistemology, Science & Nature, Mathematics, Statistics
Cover of the book The Concept of Reduction by Raphael van Riel, Springer International Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Raphael van Riel ISBN: 9783319041629
Publisher: Springer International Publishing Publication: February 19, 2014
Imprint: Springer Language: English
Author: Raphael van Riel
ISBN: 9783319041629
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Publication: February 19, 2014
Imprint: Springer
Language: English

This volume investigates the notion of reduction. Building on the idea that philosophers employ the term ‘reduction’ to reconcile diversity and directionality with unity, without relying on elimination, the book offers a powerful explication of an “ontological”, notion of reduction the extension of which is (primarily) formed by properties, kinds, individuals, or processes. It argues that related notions of reduction, such as theory-reduction and functional reduction, should be defined in terms of this explication. Thereby, the book offers a coherent framework, which sheds light on the history of the various reduction debates in the philosophy of science and in the philosophy of mind, and on related topics such as reduction and unification, the notion of a scientific level, and physicalism.

The book takes its point of departure in the examination of a puzzle about reduction. To illustrate, the book takes as an example the reduction of water. If water reduces to H2O, then water is identical to H2O – thus we get unity. Unity does not come at the price of elimination – claiming that water reduces to H2O, we do not thereby claim that there is no water. But what about diversity and directionality? Intuitively, there should be a difference between water and H2O, such that we get diversity. This is required for there to be directionality: in a sense, if water reduces to H2O, then H2O is prior to, or more basic than water. At least, if water reduces to H2O, then H2O does not reduce to water. But how can this be, if water is identical to H2O? The book shows that the application of current models of reduction does not solve this puzzle, and proposes a new coherent definition, according to which unity is tied to identity, diversity is descriptive in nature, and directionality is the directionality of explanation.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This volume investigates the notion of reduction. Building on the idea that philosophers employ the term ‘reduction’ to reconcile diversity and directionality with unity, without relying on elimination, the book offers a powerful explication of an “ontological”, notion of reduction the extension of which is (primarily) formed by properties, kinds, individuals, or processes. It argues that related notions of reduction, such as theory-reduction and functional reduction, should be defined in terms of this explication. Thereby, the book offers a coherent framework, which sheds light on the history of the various reduction debates in the philosophy of science and in the philosophy of mind, and on related topics such as reduction and unification, the notion of a scientific level, and physicalism.

The book takes its point of departure in the examination of a puzzle about reduction. To illustrate, the book takes as an example the reduction of water. If water reduces to H2O, then water is identical to H2O – thus we get unity. Unity does not come at the price of elimination – claiming that water reduces to H2O, we do not thereby claim that there is no water. But what about diversity and directionality? Intuitively, there should be a difference between water and H2O, such that we get diversity. This is required for there to be directionality: in a sense, if water reduces to H2O, then H2O is prior to, or more basic than water. At least, if water reduces to H2O, then H2O does not reduce to water. But how can this be, if water is identical to H2O? The book shows that the application of current models of reduction does not solve this puzzle, and proposes a new coherent definition, according to which unity is tied to identity, diversity is descriptive in nature, and directionality is the directionality of explanation.

More books from Springer International Publishing

Cover of the book The Idea of Social Science and Proper Phenomenology by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book Granular Dynamics, Contact Mechanics and Particle System Simulations by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book Business Ethics and Leadership from an Eastern European, Transdisciplinary Context by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book Customer Value, Shareholder Wealth, Community Wellbeing by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book The Economy of South Asia by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book Pocket Guide to Kidney Stone Prevention by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book Small Volume Biopsy in Pediatric Tumors by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book The Chemical Bond I by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book Advances in Fuzzy Decision Making by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book Computer Algebra and Polynomials by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book The Contribution of Young Researchers to Bayesian Statistics by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book Cultural Landscape Management at Borobudur, Indonesia by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book Proceedings of China-Europe Conference on Geotechnical Engineering by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book Supporting University Ventures in Nanotechnology, Biomaterials and Magnetic Sensing Applications by Raphael van Riel
Cover of the book Modeling Discrete Competitive Facility Location by Raphael van Riel
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy