The Differences between Groups and Teams. A Comparative Conceptual Analysis and Practical Implications

Nonfiction, Sports
Cover of the book The Differences between Groups and Teams. A Comparative Conceptual Analysis and Practical Implications by Christoph Rosenthal, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Christoph Rosenthal ISBN: 9783656977780
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: June 11, 2015
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Christoph Rosenthal
ISBN: 9783656977780
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: June 11, 2015
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2014 in the subject Sport - Sport Psychology, London School of Economics, language: English, abstract: Groups are inherent to the existence of human beings. The well-known Aristotelian statement about men being social animals by nature encapsulates the importance of groups in that grouping is a fundamentally social phenomenon. Human beings and their animal ancestors have always been grouping in order to fullfil needs of social bonding, reproduction and to survive. Whereas survival is not their primary purpose anymore, different kinds of groups are still present in contemporary societies. One variety of groups that has gained increasing attention in organisational and academic realms is the team. The concepts of group and team have unwarily been used as seemingly interchangeable without a clear conceptual differentiation . In the literature on leadership in teams, for example, it has been argued that leaders in teams ought 'to do, or get done, whatever is not being adequately handled for group needs'. Likewise, in organisational contexts, it has been claimed that 'teams and groups are really just the same thing'. Tackling the absence of a clear conceptual and practical distinction between the two terms, the essay at hand forges a comprehensive synopsis of the key differences between groups and teams in the broader field around social psychology. It argues that differentiating between these concepts is of crucial importance both in organisational and scholarly contexts mainly because teams function on the micro rather than the macro level. After a brief overview of the dissimilar appearances of groups and teams in the literature, the two terms are related conceptually before a comparative analysis through the concept of leadership illuminates further key differences. Subsequently, a discussion of potential implications for organizational and academic contexts precedes the final conclusion.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2014 in the subject Sport - Sport Psychology, London School of Economics, language: English, abstract: Groups are inherent to the existence of human beings. The well-known Aristotelian statement about men being social animals by nature encapsulates the importance of groups in that grouping is a fundamentally social phenomenon. Human beings and their animal ancestors have always been grouping in order to fullfil needs of social bonding, reproduction and to survive. Whereas survival is not their primary purpose anymore, different kinds of groups are still present in contemporary societies. One variety of groups that has gained increasing attention in organisational and academic realms is the team. The concepts of group and team have unwarily been used as seemingly interchangeable without a clear conceptual differentiation . In the literature on leadership in teams, for example, it has been argued that leaders in teams ought 'to do, or get done, whatever is not being adequately handled for group needs'. Likewise, in organisational contexts, it has been claimed that 'teams and groups are really just the same thing'. Tackling the absence of a clear conceptual and practical distinction between the two terms, the essay at hand forges a comprehensive synopsis of the key differences between groups and teams in the broader field around social psychology. It argues that differentiating between these concepts is of crucial importance both in organisational and scholarly contexts mainly because teams function on the micro rather than the macro level. After a brief overview of the dissimilar appearances of groups and teams in the literature, the two terms are related conceptually before a comparative analysis through the concept of leadership illuminates further key differences. Subsequently, a discussion of potential implications for organizational and academic contexts precedes the final conclusion.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Grenzen von Verbandseinfluss. Inwieweit nehmen Verbände Einfluss auf politische Entscheidungen? by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Cäsar und der Bürgerkrieg by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Ängste im Kindes- und Jugendalter by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Die Europäische Politische Gemeinschaft by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Direttive Comunitarie e insolvenza del datore di Lavoro by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Umgekehrter Unternehmenserwerb: Umsetzung in der Konzernrechnungslegung nach IFRS by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Schlägermädchen by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book R. Schumann: Myrten, op. 25 by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Der Uluru (Ayers Rock). Die heilige Stätte der Anangu in Australien. by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Ist Japan eine moderne Gesellschaft? by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Das pflegerische Therapiemanagement in der klinischen Akutpsychiatrie by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Biostatistik und Grundlagen der Beprobung by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Selbstbestimmung oder Fremdherrschaft? Der Nationalstaat im Spannungsfeld der Globalisierung by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Gibt es ein gesichertes Wissen? - Eine Grundfrage der Philosophie und Descartes` Antwort by Christoph Rosenthal
Cover of the book Rift-lines within European regulatory framework for Biosimilars when taking heterogeneity and variation during lifecycle of the reference biologic and the biosimilar into account by Christoph Rosenthal
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy