The European Economic and Social Committee - A sufficient institution for participation?

A sufficient institution for participation?

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book The European Economic and Social Committee - A sufficient institution for participation? by Daniel Neugebauer, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Daniel Neugebauer ISBN: 9783638627740
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: March 16, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Daniel Neugebauer
ISBN: 9783638627740
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: March 16, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Essay from the year 2007 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 2,0, University of Twente (Bedrijf Bestuur en Technologie), course: European Institutions, 7 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Although the European Economic and Social Committee exists since 1957, there is only scarce literature on this institution. While in the 80s and 90s a few articles and books were published, there has been hardly any literature since 2000. This mere fact may already provide an indication of the Committee's role in today's institutional structure of the European Union: Civil society has found other ways of representation. On the one hand, formal ways of participating in the decision making process increased, for instance through the various consultative bodies around the European Commission. On the other hand, informal participation through lobbying has grown and is often regarded as being more profitable and more efficient than the involvement of an assembly with 344 members which has to agree with a majority on its opinions. Not only on this account is the work of the EESC facing critics. Under the heading 'Four good reasons to abolish the Economic and Social Committee', Helle Thorning-Schmidt (2003), member of the European Convention and European Parliament, challenges the Committee's right to exist. Her accusations are profound: Unfocused, too expensive, inefficient and not sufficiently European was the EESC's work. Other authors are not so pessimistic. Vierlich-Jürcke (1998) refers to the Committee's ability to 'democratize' the decision making system in the European Union by fostering the dialogue between government and the public. Smismans (2000) agrees on these positive effects, but is in favour of some changes to the composition of the Committee. He wants to strengthen links between civil society, broaden the deliberative basis and bring more expertise. He states that an increased input-legitimacy contributes to output-legitimacy. On a more abstract basis, the critics are not only about efficiency and legitimacy. The question whether the Committee has (still) a right to exist touches the concept of democracy we want to establish in the European Union. The EU has been a 'participatory democracy' from the beginning, and the Constitution's article 46 again strengthens possibilities to participate.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2007 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 2,0, University of Twente (Bedrijf Bestuur en Technologie), course: European Institutions, 7 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Although the European Economic and Social Committee exists since 1957, there is only scarce literature on this institution. While in the 80s and 90s a few articles and books were published, there has been hardly any literature since 2000. This mere fact may already provide an indication of the Committee's role in today's institutional structure of the European Union: Civil society has found other ways of representation. On the one hand, formal ways of participating in the decision making process increased, for instance through the various consultative bodies around the European Commission. On the other hand, informal participation through lobbying has grown and is often regarded as being more profitable and more efficient than the involvement of an assembly with 344 members which has to agree with a majority on its opinions. Not only on this account is the work of the EESC facing critics. Under the heading 'Four good reasons to abolish the Economic and Social Committee', Helle Thorning-Schmidt (2003), member of the European Convention and European Parliament, challenges the Committee's right to exist. Her accusations are profound: Unfocused, too expensive, inefficient and not sufficiently European was the EESC's work. Other authors are not so pessimistic. Vierlich-Jürcke (1998) refers to the Committee's ability to 'democratize' the decision making system in the European Union by fostering the dialogue between government and the public. Smismans (2000) agrees on these positive effects, but is in favour of some changes to the composition of the Committee. He wants to strengthen links between civil society, broaden the deliberative basis and bring more expertise. He states that an increased input-legitimacy contributes to output-legitimacy. On a more abstract basis, the critics are not only about efficiency and legitimacy. The question whether the Committee has (still) a right to exist touches the concept of democracy we want to establish in the European Union. The EU has been a 'participatory democracy' from the beginning, and the Constitution's article 46 again strengthens possibilities to participate.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Die Debatte um den Laizismus - Frankreich und Deutschland im Vergleich by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Mobbing. Psychosoziale Belastungen in der Schule by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Berücksichtigung von Synergieeffekten bei der Ermittlung eines Entscheidungswertes und der gesetzlich-normierten Abfindungsbemessung by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Fluviale Prozesse und Formen by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Lead-User - Konzept und Bedeutung im Innovationsprozess by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Peter Singer - Bioethik aus der präferenzutilitaristischen Perspektive by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Corporate Publishing - Eigenschaften, Formen, Bedeutung by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book A Brief History of the Economic Relations between Vietnam and Japan by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Übersichten erhaltener Werke antiker Autoren - Band 4: Platon by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Individuelles Wissensmanagement by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Die Haftung des GmbH-Geschäftsführers gegenüber Dritten (Außenhaftung) in der werbenden GmbH by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Geschichte der türkischen Utopien by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Zur Theorie des 'Kampf der Kulturen' nach Samuel P. Huntington by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Kognition und menschliche Persönlichkeit - Eine Auseinandersetzung mit der Entwicklungspsychologie Jean Piagets by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Der Transfer von Kreditrisiken - Systemische Risiken und Reformvorschläge by Daniel Neugebauer
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy