Wither Power Politics?

A Study of the United States' Approach to the Caspian Sea Region 1991-2001

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Security
Cover of the book Wither Power Politics? by Bradley Axmith, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Bradley Axmith ISBN: 9783656343165
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: January 2, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Bradley Axmith
ISBN: 9783656343165
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: January 2, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Master's Thesis from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, , course: US Foreign Policy, International Relations in the Caspian Sea Region, language: English, abstract: The New Great Game in the Caspian Sea Region received moderate attention from scholars following the collapse of the Soviet Union because it resembled the continuation of rivalry between Washington and Moscow. For the eight Caspian republics, the discovery of vast oil and gas deposits was the key to securing the newly independent states' sovereignty away from Moscow's control toward integration with Europe and the United States. This thesis analyses the US' treatment of the Caspian Sea Region between 1991 and 2001, in order to measure whether its policies were crafted according to Realist tenets in formulating policy designed to advance its security. The historical record seen through Offensive Realism presents evidence that US foreign policy was governed by principles not balance of power considerations, led by the false notion that democratic Russia would act in accordance with US goals. Intent on fostering democracy in Russia the United States denied the competitive nature of international politics, refusing to criticize abuses by Moscow in the region and failing to intervene when US interests were marginalised. The US failed to prevent Russia from refashioning conditions conducive to the reabsorption of the Caucasus and Central Asia as a sphere of influence; nor did it account for China's expanded role and trajectory as a challenge to US power. This analysis shows, for example, that Russia's proximity and willingness to use force exceeded the capabilities of the US' use of its global predominance to shape regional events.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Master's Thesis from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, , course: US Foreign Policy, International Relations in the Caspian Sea Region, language: English, abstract: The New Great Game in the Caspian Sea Region received moderate attention from scholars following the collapse of the Soviet Union because it resembled the continuation of rivalry between Washington and Moscow. For the eight Caspian republics, the discovery of vast oil and gas deposits was the key to securing the newly independent states' sovereignty away from Moscow's control toward integration with Europe and the United States. This thesis analyses the US' treatment of the Caspian Sea Region between 1991 and 2001, in order to measure whether its policies were crafted according to Realist tenets in formulating policy designed to advance its security. The historical record seen through Offensive Realism presents evidence that US foreign policy was governed by principles not balance of power considerations, led by the false notion that democratic Russia would act in accordance with US goals. Intent on fostering democracy in Russia the United States denied the competitive nature of international politics, refusing to criticize abuses by Moscow in the region and failing to intervene when US interests were marginalised. The US failed to prevent Russia from refashioning conditions conducive to the reabsorption of the Caucasus and Central Asia as a sphere of influence; nor did it account for China's expanded role and trajectory as a challenge to US power. This analysis shows, for example, that Russia's proximity and willingness to use force exceeded the capabilities of the US' use of its global predominance to shape regional events.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Internetauktionen - Charakteristiken und Entwicklungspotentiale by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Städtebaukonzepte im Dritten Reich und deren Umsetzung am Beispiel Wolfsburg by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Die Kommission als supranationaler Akteur in der europäischen Umweltpolitik by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Die Geschichte der O - Die 'Bibel des SM' als literarisches Werk by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Ein römischer Grieche schreibt Geschichte. Die Geschichtsschreibung des Polybios by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Das CobiT®-Referenzmodell im Kontext einer IT-Strategie by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Entwicklungsprobleme Brasiliens und lateinamerikanischer Staaten - Befunde und Ursachen sozialer Ungleichhheiten in Lateinamerika by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Personalfluktuation und Personalbindung im Top-Management-Bereich in der Phase der Post Merger Integration by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Deutung des Bauernkrieges in der Geschichtsschreibung by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Homosexualität im Nazi-Deutschland by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Cyber-Mobbing. Bedeutung für die aktuelle sozialpädagogische Arbeit mit Jugendlichen by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Das Leben des Claudius vor seinem Herrschaftsantritt by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Mangelndes Engagement am Arbeitsplatz by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Heranwachsende zwischen Konformität und Individualisierung by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book The Act of Political Assassination in Nigeria by Bradley Axmith
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy